最近ISSI newsletter上，几个科学计量学大碗发表了一篇文章，总结了科学计量学指标用于个人科研成果评价的困境，试图提出一般性的指导原则。

Wouters, P.  Glanzel, W. Glaser, J. Rafols, I. (2013). The dilemmas of performance indicators of individual researchers : an urgent debate in bibliometrics. ISSI　newsletter. 9(3). 48-53. 

但回顾以后，他们还是觉得没有绝对的标准，任何一个指标在评价个人的科研成果的时候，都有所偏差，但无论如何，他们提出个人科研成果评价十要十不要，我觉得应该算是科学计量学界对《旧金山宣言》的一种回应。

这篇文章有个副标题，An urgent debate in bibliometrics, 很显然，如何合理评价个人科研成果，会是科学计量学今后发展的一个焦点，这一点我想对科学计量学的选题会是一个很好的参考框架。

TEN THINGS YOU MUST NOT DO:

1. Don’t reduce individual performance to a single number

2. Don’t use journal impact factors as measures of quality of individual researchers

3. Don’t apply hidden “bibliometric filters” for selection

4. Don’t apply arbitrary weights to co-authorships

5. Don’t rank scientists according to one indicator

6. Don’t merge incommensurable measures

7. Don’t use flawed statistics

8. Don’t blindly trust one-hit wonders

9. Don’t compare apples and oranges

10.Don’t allow deadlines and workload to compel you to drop good practices.

TEN THINGS YOU CAN DO:

1. Basic measures such as numbers of publications and citations are still relevant statistical measures

2. Analyze collaboration patterns of researchers

3. Always combine quantitative and qualitative method

4. Use citation context analysis

5. Analyze subject profiles of individual researchers

6. Make an explicit choice betweenthe analysis of the full oeuvre orcomparative analysis using a citation window

7. Combine bibliometrics with career analysis

8. Clean bibliometric data carefully and use external sources

9. Don’t take this list of dos and don’ts too absolutely: even some don’ts canbe used given the right context

10.Help users to interpret and use your results.

我没有翻译，有兴趣的，可以翻译一下 。