Nature没有签《旧金山宣言》意味着什么？咸鱼也会有翻身的机会吗?

The declaration also has some unsupportable elements， something Philip Campbell, the editor of Nature, Pointed out in an interview in the Chronicil of Higher Education, pointing out that Nature has not signed on to DORA:

. . . the draft statement contained many specific elements, some of which were too sweeping for me or my colleagues to sign up to.

Nature一直推崇h指数，h指数因为Nature的推崇而风行天下，所以，nature觉得旧金山宣言打击面过宽。science和nature截然不同的态度。也许意味着我们这个基于影响因子的行业还有喘息的余地？

但实际上，如果放弃影响因子，我们能做的事情，可能更多。

 

 

 

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自刘玉仙科学网博客。
链接地址：https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-215715-710937.html

上一篇：维也纳的我
下一篇：惹起一地鸡毛的影响因子