会放仙法的小恶魔分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/hentai

博文

基本率谬误

已有 6326 次阅读 2014-1-5 06:29 |系统分类:科研笔记

基本比率谬误

http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E6%AF%94%E7%8E%87%E8%AC%AC%E8%AA%A4

基本比率谬误(base rate fallacy)或基本率谬误忽略基本比率(Neglecting Base Rates)

评:这里的说明不够好,懂的人不用看,不懂的看了没有本质印象。

 

Base rate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate

In probability and statistics, base rate generally refers to the (base) class probabilities unconditioned on featural evidence, frequently also known as prior probabilities.

 

Base rate fallacy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy

Base rate fallacy, also called base rate neglect or base rate bias, is an error in thinking.

评:这里的说明略完备。

 

相关内容还在论及“贝叶斯推理”和“认知偏见”等问题时常见。

 

《Nature》的这篇报道里也提到这个问题:
http://www.nature.com/news/policy-twenty-tips-for-interpreting-scientific-claims-1.14183
Beware the base-rate fallacy. 

 

 

《Nature》里也有专门谈论这个问题的文章:
Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v380/n6571/pdf/380247a0.pdf

Base-rate errors and rain forecasts
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v382/n6594/pdf/382766a0.pdf

这两篇全文阅读需要注册。


同样的问题这里也有论及:
Theories of truth as assessment criteria in judgment and decision making
http://mars.smu.edu.sg/SJDM/ccd/ccd.html
Base rate neglect: An example of Hammond’s claim



https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1091259-755965.html

上一篇:1/4-1/8
下一篇:这次地震前瞻数据重录
收藏 IP: 171.83.206.*| 热度|

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-10-21 07:26

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部