经过了太多的研究和讨论，我回答了张院士的一个问题，这个问题提出就是在 物理评论E  上，所以就向那里投了。第一稿 一个反对，一个提了好多问题；好在提的问题都回答了，第二稿，开始反对的那个科学家也支持我了。有几点注意的：

（1）做真正的科研，想凑数就找低的刊物。您自己要有把握，你的理论必须是对的。

（2）不要怕难，多花费时间就是了，视科研为乐。

（3）要有主见。

（4）充分尊重前辈的成果。

下面是审稿的过程：

CURRENT STATUS OF MANUSCRIPT: Editorially approved for publication

CORRESPONDENCE:
SENT    RECEIVED    DESCRIPTION
26Mar09         Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
25Mar09 26Mar09 Correspondence sent to author; response received
19Mar09         Editorially approved for publication
16Mar09         Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
11Mar09 14Mar09 Ed. decision and/or ref. comments to author; response rcvd
23Feb09 09Mar09 Review request to referee; report received
23Feb09 25Feb09 Review request to referee; report received
17Feb09         Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author
29Jan09 16Feb09 Ed. decision and/or ref. comments to author; response rcvd
23Dec08 26Jan09 Review request to referee; report received
13Jan09 14Jan09 Reminder to referee; response received
17Dec08 06Jan09 Review request to referee; report received
17Dec08 23Dec08 Review request to referee; message received (not a report)
15Dec08         Acknowledgment sent to author
15Dec08         Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author

相关专题：投稿与审稿
转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自张屹科学网博客。
链接地址：https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-108242-223192.html


下一篇：一篇concept 论文的投稿经历