||
在科学网上“零落成泥碾作尘”
吕乃基,2015-09-25,在科学网上“零落成泥碾作尘”
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-210844-923281.html
感叹“点击、评论和推荐都创新低。”
可是,俺的《“牛逼爆炸”级别的成果:磁场依赖参照系》
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-923159.html
已有 179 次阅读
当前推荐数:1 推荐人: 王小平
还不如吕教授的啊!
———————— 后记 ————————
科技成果水平的层次划分(建议)
-2)吓傻;
-1)害怕;
0)无语;
1) 牛逼爆炸;(由宇宙科学院推荐)
2)宇宙领先;(由宇宙科学院认定)
3)宇宙先进;
4)本星系群领先;
5)本星系群先进;
6)银河系领先;
7)银河系先进;
8)诺奖级别;
9) 国际领先;
10) 国际先进;
11) 国内领先;
12) 国内先进。
背景资料:
[1] 孙学军,2015-08-28,学术论文,让我如何相信你!精选
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-41174-916523.html
[2] Monya Baker, 27 August 2015, Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test Largest replication study to date casts doubt on many published positive results.
http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248
[3] Open Science Collaboration, Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science, Science 28 August 2015: Vol. 349 no. 6251 , DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716, RESEARCH ARTICLE
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716.abstract
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716
[4] 孙学军,2015-06-10,美国无法重复生物医学研究年度费用高达280亿美元精选
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-41174-896872.html
[5] Monya Baker, 09 June 2015, Irreproducible biology research costs put at $28 billion per year Study calculates cost of flawed biomedical research in the United States.
http://www.nature.com/news/irreproducible-biology-research-costs-put-at-28-billion-per-year-1.17711
[6] 许培扬,2014-07-10,CNPS顶级学术期刊论文的实验数据50%不能重现
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-280034-810594.html
[7] Meredith Wadman, 31 July 2013, NIH mulls rules for validating key results US biomedical agency could enlist independent labs for verification.
http://www.nature.com/news/nih-mulls-rules-for-validating-key-results-1.13469
[8] Lisa Bero, PNAS, 2015-01-12, 科学家分析同行评审有效性
http://paper.sciencenet.cn/htmlpaper/201511219413977135306.shtm
[9] Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. 作者: Siler, Kyle; Lee, Kirby; Bero, Lisa. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 卷: 112 期: 2 页: 360-365 出版年: JAN 13 2015
http://www.pnas.org/content/112/2/360
[10] 张九庆,2015-01-06,科学进步的未来:一个比喻性的总结
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-542-856902.html
[11] 新华网,2015-04-15,职称论文:“三宗罪”千夫所指,干脆取消行不行?
http://news.xinhuanet.com/local/2015-04/15/c_1114969888.htm
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-11-8 02:39
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社