求真分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/zlyang 求真务实

博文

[?糊涂了] 波动中能量守恒吗?(附:水面干涉条纹图片)

已有 2788 次阅读 2022-12-13 15:15 |个人分类:基础数学-逻辑-物理|系统分类:科研笔记

[?糊涂了] 波动中能量守恒吗?(附:水面干涉条纹图片)

                          

一、两个波的叠加

superposition-of-waves-n_副本.jpg

图1  波叠加的两种特殊情况

PPT - Physical Optics PowerPoint Presentation - ID:4446197

https://image2.slideserve.com/4446197/superposition-of-waves-n.jpg

https://www.slideserve.com/mika/physical-optics

                  

   可见:两个同频正弦波,

   (1)同相位叠加,振幅可以增大一倍;

   (2)反相位叠加,波动消失了。

             

   疑问:

   波动的能量,怎么具体定义?如果按照振幅的平方/2定义,“反相位叠加,波动消失了”情况下,原来的能量去哪里了?

   上面是不是“能量守恒”的反例?

   《电工学》里通过定义“负量”来保证能量守恒。即:电感的无功功率为“正数”,电容的无功功率为“负数”。

   或者说,上面是“非惯性系”,里面“能量不守恒”?

                                            

反相位 1111111111_副本_副本 加圆圈.jpg

图2  两个反相位正弦波相遇时,会出现什么现象?就是红圈附近的变化。

                        

   一个类似的情况:假如上面图2两端是机械振动(正弦,反相位),中间的黑线是一根较长的有一定弹性的绳子。这是可以测量的一个场景。

   有没有人做过这个实体实验?

                              

二、网上搜索到的3幅图片

   感谢原作者和有关人员!

                        

Have You Seen The Double Slit Experiment.jpg

图3  你看过双缝实验吗?

Have You Seen The Double Slit Experiment? - Page 2 of 2 - Shocking Science

https://ts1.cn.mm.bing.net/th/id/R-C.c22006a2fe9c5b5f06a262074d822c7f?rik=ftvOv0CPW6JQaQ&riu=http%3a%2f%2fwww.shockingscience.com%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2fsites%2f879%2f2015%2f12%2fpic1.jpg&ehk=mW0etMA8j%2fExlbn25QhfcLk9dcMel%2fQ09SB3WHPJtyY%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0

https://www.shockingscience.com/have-you-seen-the-double-slit-experiment/2/

                              

Wave interference pattern. Waves from two sources are interacting with each other.jpg

图4  波干扰模式

Wave Interference Pattern

https://media.sciencephoto.com/image/c0279806/800wm/C0279806-Wave_Interference_Pattern.jpg

https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/705978/view/wave-interference-pattern

                                                

Two slit interference pattern showing destructive interference (dark lines) and .jpg

图5  显示相消干涉(暗线)和相长干涉(明线)的双缝干涉图案

Two slit interference pattern showing destructive interference (dark lines) and constructive interference (bright lines)

https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.ucsc.edu/dist/a/487/files/2016/01/main-qimg-75ebaf3dcce5031dbfd0c36426788499-1-171leep.jpg

https://ucscphysicsdemo.sites.ucsc.edu/physics-5b6b-demos/sound-interference-two-point-spacial/

    Explanation:

   This is a demonstration of the famous double-slit interference pattern, which was the forefront discovery of superposition in wavelengths. The experiment was first performed by Thomas Young in 1801, where he displayed incident light being shone upon two small cuts in a boundary. What he found is that the light wavelengths diffract through the slits and produce a pattern of interference (see Fig 1). This interference pattern produced lines of constructive and destructive interference called antinodes and nodes, respectively. (see Fig 1).

   这是著名的双缝干涉图的演示,这是波长叠加的最前沿发现。1801年,托马斯·杨(Thomas Young)首次进行了这项实验,他展示了入射光照射在边界上的两个小切口上。他发现,光波长通过狭缝衍射并产生干涉图案(见图1)。这种干涉模式产生了相长干涉线和相消干涉线,分别称为波腹和节点(波节)。(见图1)。 注:就是上面图5

                              

参考资料:

[1] Lecture 20: Interference of Waves, Beats

https://sites.ualberta.ca/~pogosyan/teaching/PHYS_130/FALL_2010/lectures/lect20/lecture20.html

[2] Albert Einstein. On the Method of Theoretical Physics [J]. Philosophy of Science, 1934, 1(2): 163-169.

doi:10.1086/286316 

https://www.jstor.org/stable/184387

   Pure logical thinking can give us no knowledge whatsoever of the world of experience; all knowledge about reality begins with experience and terminates in it. Conclusions obtained by purely rational processes are, so far as Reality is concerned, entirely empty. It was because he recognized this, and especially because he impressed it upon the scientific world that Galileo became the father of modern physics and in fact of the whole of modern natural science.    page 164

[3] 刘全慧,2022-12-10,相干波的能量佯谬

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3377-1367325.html

相关链接:

[1] 2022-12-12,[笔记] 电子对撞实验构想:是否可以直接探索电子内部结构?

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1367614.html

[2] 2022-12-11,[请教] 能量守恒与“相干波的能量佯谬”

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1367500.html

[3] 2022-12-06,感谢“中科院科学智慧火花”给贴出评论:反思麦克斯韦经典电磁场理论方面的 2 个评论

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1366801.html

[4] 2022-09-28,历史上经典科学实验的现代再检验:“硬凑”的逻辑

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1357231.html

[5] 2016-10-13,[讨论] 电磁学(物理学)的基础:磁场的起因

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1008502.html

[6] 2015-3-10,假如电子是流体,其直径是什么?怎么测量?

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-873357.html

[7] 2019-03-05,[建议] 宏观点电荷发出的磁场、电磁波判定实验原理

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1165792.html

[8] 2012-12-12,电荷真伟大(打油)

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-641876.html

                          

[9] 2022-12-01,[小资料] 人类祖先露西 Human ancestor Lucy

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1366098.html

[10] 2022-11-30,[图片,搜集,小资料] 人类进化和古人类

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1365932.html

[11] 2022-10-13,[求助] 关于“量子纠缠”的科普级答疑

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1359275.html

[12] 2022-10-04,[小科普,备课] 电话的发明人安东尼奥·梅乌奇 Antonio Meucci

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1357970.html

                                 

感谢您的指教!

感谢您指正以上任何错误!

感谢您提供更多的相关资料!



https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1367742.html

上一篇:[笔记] 电子对撞实验构想:是否可以直接探索电子内部结构?
下一篇:[?] 《三体》随笔:银河系、猎户旋臂、歌者;最新真的银河系图片
收藏 IP: 111.30.247.*| 热度|

8 檀成龙 尤明庆 王涛 张学文 刘德力 孙颉 郑永军 许培扬

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (6 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-16 16:50

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部