casgirl的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/casgirl

博文

Nature news发表有关叶诗文夺冠是否服用禁药的文章引发争议

已有 4219 次阅读 2012-8-4 01:17 |系统分类:博客资讯| nature, 伦敦, 奥运, 叶诗文

关于叶诗文夺冠是否服用禁药,最近一直都是西方那些猴子媒体们热烈讨论的对象,连NatureNews上也发表了一篇相关的文章,题为“Why great Olympic feats raise suspicions ”(原文链接:http://www.nature.com/news/why-great-olympic-feats-raise-suspicions-1.11109),讲述叶诗文夺冠是如何如何不可能。文章列举错误数据,误导人们思想。不过相关的一些错误也被Nature的编辑在最近作出了修改,但是该文的存在本身就是一个错误。

该文发表短期内便引发了轩然大波。。。发表后得到的关注一直上升,评论不断增加。不过增加的同时,也有一些评论在“悄悄地”消失,有点像我朝作风。。。。评论中亮点不断,各种讨论,各种争吵。

摘了一些比较经典的评论放在这里,否则明天又找不到了。。。

1. AllanMcNish said: It is disturbing that Nature.com is deliberately deletingcomments, the same feat Big Brothers in Communist China have been doing.(这都知道,神人啊~~~

2. This article is obviously full of scientific flaws and false data, why it can bepublished on Nature?(这才是科学家作风哈哈)

3. Thisis the last time I visit Nature. Not that I have turned into a Nature hater,but my time will be better spent at other places where I can find real scienceinstead of hyped fabrications.(瞧人家这气魄。。。)

4. It'sa shame for Nature to publish such an article with a lot of biased andmisleading information and absolutely no fact support.(绝对支持你言论啊。。。It’s really a shame

5. Enochsaid: During these days I see not only the decay of Olympic spirit but also thecorrupt of scientific spirit in UK! What a shame on Nature!(是啊,伦敦的奥运精神和科学精神都他妹的令人汗颜啊)

还有神级的评论:

1B Stone said: “Is thisarticle published in Nature?” “Yes.” “Really?” “Really.”

2Elaine Kim said: Iappreciate all the scientific comments here.
So why did Nature publish the unscientific news?
The only reason is that, it comes from London, GBR.
(是的,完全正确,Nature为嘛发表非科学的呢?因为它来自伦敦,大不列颠。哈哈。(注:纯属戏言

3、还有个笑话:

Monkey: Donkey, this is the best summer Ihave ever had.
Donkey: what made you so excited?
Monkey: Something in London, for sure.
Donkey: I know, the Olympics.
Monkey: hey, I am not the sport guy. I just can do a little bit better inclimbing.
Donkey: then what?
Monkey: I found the biggest science shit in the world.
Donkey: Come on, my mum always ask me to eat more. You know.
Monkey: serious, I am not joking at all.
Donkey: what are you talking about?
Monkey: Nature.

笔者小注 Nature的这个新闻确实像一坨屎。。。。跟伦敦奥运有的一拼哈~~~

不仅仅是这些针对Nature杂志以及调侃的评论,该文还引发了中外科学家有关中国是否透明的争论。。。妹啊,辐射面真是广。。。。

   不过,言归正传,Nature,你还能更有偏见一点吗?一个顶级刊物,你搞这些带偏见的新闻干嘛?吸引注意力吗?还是,真的因为你来自,GBR

http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-560137-598809.html

上一篇:写在毕业季
下一篇:又是一个新单位,又是一个月

2 赫英 温世正

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (6 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2020-11-29 05:02

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部