Bobby的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/Bobby

博文

如何评价科学家的工作?替代计量学与同行评议孰胜孰优?

已有 320 次阅读 2017-11-12 23:00 |个人分类:科学感想|系统分类:博客资讯

如何评价科学家的工作?替代计量学(Altmetrics)与同行评议(peer review)孰胜孰优?


Today, advocates of altmetrics argue that well-made algorithms can mimic and aggregate the everyday acts of judgement that researchers make when they read, cite, link or otherwise engage with published research. These algorithms, they claim, will turn out to be as good or better at replicating established processes — such as peer review — that are supposed to delimit what constitutes important and trustworthy research.


自今天NATURE网站一篇文章:

The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science

As new ways emerge to assess research, Alex Csiszar recalls how the first one transformed the practice and place of science in society.





http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-39731-1084965.html

上一篇:天下之大,无奇不有
下一篇:专家良心坏了怎么能有效地同行评议?
收藏 分享 举报

4 许培扬 郑学军 尤明庆 杨正瓴

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备14006957 )

GMT+8, 2017-11-20 02:03

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007-2017 中国科学报社

返回顶部