|
因博士论文研究方向,是关注课堂学生小组互动,故而从去年开始就关注到了社会认知。但一直没有非常深入的挖掘到较好的文献,但今天无意间中检索到了西班牙Teun A. van Dijk的社会认知研究,发现他做的研究很猛,他本人则更猛。
先附一下他的谷歌学术主页:https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gyhvnfcAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
一、Teun A. van Dijk社会认知研究成果概况
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009).‘Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach.’In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer, 62-86, selected 62-67, 75-80. London: Sage.【这个版本以及这本书,暂时查不到。】
Van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Methods of critical discourse studies, 63-74.【应该是Van Dijk, T. A. (2009)的再版。如下分析框架,就是来之于这个章节内容。】
二、Teun A. van Dijk社会认知分析框架
Teun A. van Dijk社会认知分析框架,主要就是如下的三角社会认知分析框架,而且主要指向的是种族话语的分析(详见下中英文翻译器翻译的结果,精力所限,未做精翻译)。因为我研究的主要是教育领域学生协作问题解决过程中的社会认知等,所以其分析框架的一般结构以及思路是我可以借鉴的。但我更需要借鉴的,可能还是教育领域已有的社会认知分析框架扥等。
A triangular sociocognitive account of racist discourse
种族主义话语的三角社会认知
The relevance of a triangular sociocognitive approach may be illustrated withreference to the study of racist discourse. First of all, the discursive compo-nent of the theory deals with the many structures of racist text and talk, suchas specific topics, negative descriptions of minorities or immigrants, disclaim-ers, the lexicon and other grammatical structures, topoi, argumentationor metaphors, among many other structures of ideological polarizationbetween 'Us' and 'Them'. Secondly, such discourse structures are interpretedand explained in terms of underlying, socially shared ethnic prejudices andracist ideologies and the ways they influence the mental models of individuallanguage users. Thirdly, such discourses and their underlying cognitions aresocially and politically functional in the (re)production of ethnic dominationand inequality by white dominant groups against minority groups or immi-grants. They are controlled by powerful symbolic elites and organizations,e.g. those of politics, mass media and education, who have privileged accessto public discourse. Each of these components of the theory and the analysisis necessary to account for racist discourse in society. We shall show belowthat a similar triangular approach is necessary for the study of racism andanti-racism.
一个三角形的社会认知方法的相关性可以参照种族主义话语的研究来说明。首先,该理论的话语结构涉及种族主义文本和话语的许多结构,如特定主题、少数民族或移民的负面描述、拒绝者、词汇和其他语法结构、拓扑学、辩论或隐喻等。意识形态“极化”在“我们”和“他们”之间的联系。其次,从底层、社会共享的种族偏见和种族主义意识形态以及影响个人语言使用者心理模型的方式来解释和解释这样的话语结构。第三,这些话语及其潜在的认知在种族主导的民族生产和民族平等中产生了政治上的和政治上的功能。他们受到强大的象征精英和组织的控制,例如政治、大众媒体和教育,他们有权获得公众话语权。理论和分析的每一个组成部分都有必要解释社会中的种族主义话语。我们将表明,类似的三角方法对于种族主义和反种族主义的研究是必要的。
【未完待续】
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-4-19 17:48
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社