alsoRun的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/alsoRun

博文

Consequences of the New Policies of Deemphasizing SCI papers

已有 405 次阅读 2020-2-24 10:06 |系统分类:科研笔记

Positive:


  1.       Since SCI papers can no longer directly make money, those in it mostly for money may write fewer SCI papers. Those who do it for passion will continue of course. This will lead to more interesting research and higher quality.

2.      It will promote more diverse research and projects, not just those that will lead to papers.


Negative:


1.      The bureaucrats at universities will have more power and researchers have less. When SCI papers were basis of promotion and award, the originality and importance of papers are evaluated and decided by the reviewers and editors of these SCI journals. Now the power of judging is back to the department, college and university.

2.      The upward mobility is harder. When SCI papers were the king, a professor at a less prominent university can compete and move up by publishing more SCI papers (if one’s work does not require expensive instruments). But now, this route is more difficult.  




http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3272231-1220092.html

上一篇:Why I do not like the pay-to-publish model?
下一篇:大家评评 杜立智 教授 的 p==np paper

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2020-8-4 23:56

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部