Dear SE, Since the formal operation of the JMS online manuscript system, many of you have already done initial review on manuscripts submitted to JMS before they’re sent out for peer-review. Your initial review has played a very important ro ...
JMS has adopted Tompson Reuters' ScholarOne Manuscript system since last September. All manuscripts are processed online and authors can check their manuscript status online by themselves. In spite of that, some authors still write emails to JMS to consult their manuscript status possibly because ...
Dear Dr. Wang: It is a pleasure to accept your manuscript entitled "XXXXXXXXX" in its current form for publication in the Journal of Mountain Science. Thank you for your fine contribution. This manuscript is planned for publication on the 2nd issu ...
Dear Dr. XXX: Thank you for reviewing manuscript "Assessment and Analysis on the landslide of XXXX" for the Journal of Mountain Science. On behalf of the Editors of the Journal of Mountain Science, we appreciate the voluntary contribution that each reviewer gives to the Journal. We thank yo ...
JMS-How torespondto reviewer’s comments--An example Generally, most manuscripts need revision before they are formally published. Authors are usually required to respond to each item of remark (comment) and revision suggestion in a separate document, and mark the re ...
Authors' response to reviewers' comments It's really a time-consuming thing to respond to each item of the reviever's comments.But it's a very important part totell the editor that you havecarefully considered thereviewers's comments and suggestions.Sometime ...
The Journal of Mountain Science (JMS) has formally adoptedonline manuscript submission and review system -ScholarOne Manuscript ( http://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/jmsjournal )since August 29th. All manuscripts submitted after that time will be handled online. In order to guide reviewers to ...
Dear authors: I write you in regards to manuscript 11-XXXX entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Journal of Mountain Science. In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript ha ...