hillbuct的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/hillbuct

博文

[转载]如何更加专业地为学术论文审稿?

已有 845 次阅读 2018-4-12 22:15 |系统分类:科研笔记|文章来源:转载

     近几年审稿的任务越来越多(2018年截至今日已经审稿22篇),我也乐意审稿,一来可以提前拜读同行的研究成果,二来站在审稿人的角度为别人的工作把把关,也为自己写论文积累一些经验。一直非常认真地对待每一篇稿子,也希望能给作者提供更好的建设性意见和建议。作为大龄“年轻教师和科研从业者”,我珍惜每一次审稿的机会。今天看到publons给我推送的审稿建议邮件,有几条直接从人家的建议中翻译过来,记录在此,算是自己继续提高审稿能力的过程。


遵循的审稿原则

(1) 具备必要的专业知识(审自己专长领域的稿子);

(2) 对稿件足够尊重;

(3) 对所有稿件一视同仁;

(4) 对稿件提供建设性意见和建议;

(5) 审稿人应具备包容精神;

(6) 不要害怕被报复。


如何高质量审稿?

(1) 学习并持续改进审稿技能;

(2) 阅读并了解对应期刊指南;

(3) 了解对应期刊的特点和研究领域;

(4) 至少对稿件精读两遍。


审稿的细节清单(原文更好就不翻译了😄):

1. Summary - what is the objective of the study, how did the authors seek to meet the objective and did they achieve it?

2. Impression - are there any studies on the area, and where does the study fit in the body of knowledge?

3. Abstract - is the purpose, results, and global implication clearly stated and consistent with the rest of the manuscript?

4. Introduction - did the authors clearly provide a problem statement, the state of science, and their research goals and hypothesis?

5. Experimental approach - did the authors’ experiments fully address their hypothesis in a reproducible and valid way?

6. Results - are the results clearly stated in a manner consistent with the experimental approach and research objectives?

7. Discussion - did the authors critically examine their results in light of the state of science highlighted in the introduction?

8. Conclusion - are the conclusions drawn from the study related to the hypothesis and plausible in terms of the results obtained?

9. References - did the authors faithfully cite the listed references and did they follow journal guidelines?

10. Illustrations - are the illustrations clear and saying what the authors suggested in the manuscript?

参考资料:

https://publons.com/blog/6-tips-to-writing-a-great-manuscript-review/?utm_source=PublonsUsers&utm_campaign=df953a67a2-Mixed_reviews_24.01.2018&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d203ec3f11-df953a67a2-137440005

https://publons.com/blog/5-tips-to-write-a-structured-reviewer-report/

http://www.drpaulwong.com/how-to-write-a-good-manuscript-review/


王崇臣注:前面加了一个帽子,其余均是从publons翻译和摘录的。算是转载吧。



http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1129566-1108775.html

上一篇:课题组大二的本科生画的进课题组开展科技活动的四格漫画
下一篇:天才还是魔鬼?——记小托马斯·米奇利的发明成果

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备14006957 )

GMT+8, 2018-8-15 14:57

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部