哲学驿站分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/老李 一个行走者的思想历程

博文

二战后英语世界中最重要的科学哲学家

已有 4768 次阅读 2016-3-10 15:56 |系统分类:人文社科

【博主跋】莱特报告新近推出英语世界二战后最重要的科学哲学家排行榜,基本靠谱!

1. Rudolf Carnap  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)【卡尔纳普,国内有《世界的逻辑构造》译本】

2. Thomas S. Kuhn  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 92–89【库恩,国内有《科学革命》、《必要的张力》等译本,他的观点国内比较熟】

3. Carl G. Hempel  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 106–64, loses to Thomas S. Kuhn by 99–74【亨普尔,记得有一个译本,名忘了】

4. Karl Popper  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 99–64, loses to Carl G. Hempel by 94–73【波普尔,是国内比较熟悉的科学哲学家】

5. Bas van Fraassen  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 111–69, loses to Karl Popper by 89–78【范佛拉森,记得有《科学的形象》译本】

6. W.V.O. Quine  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 115–50, loses to Bas van Fraassen by 99–71【奎因,《从逻辑的观点看》等译本】

7. Hans Reichenbach  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 124–35, loses to W.V.O. Quine by 81–67【赖兴巴赫。记得《科学哲学起源》一书】

8. Nancy Cartwright  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 127–40, loses to Hans Reichenbach by 78–72

9. Paul Feyerabend  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 123–50, loses to Nancy Cartwright by 83–74【费耶阿本德,《反对方法》等译本】

10. Ian Hacking  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 123–45, loses to Paul Feyerabend by 78–74【哈金,好像有一本,书名忘了】

11. Imre Lakatos  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 130–39, loses to Ian Hacking by 76–71【拉卡托斯,有《科学研究纲领方法论》等】

12. Hilary Putnam  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 122–41, loses to Imre Lakatos by 75–71【普特南,《理性、真理与历史》等】

13. Philip Kitcher  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 133–35, loses to Hilary Putnam by 85–63【基奇,看过一本,忘了名字】

14. Wesley Salmon  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 133–24, loses to Philip Kitcher by 70–62【萨蒙,好像有一个译本,名忘了】

15. Ernest Nagel  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 135–31, loses to Wesley Salmon by 61–58【内格尔,这也是大牛,也有译本】

16. Elliott Sober  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 136–29, loses to Ernest Nagel by 66–55

17. John Earman  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 129–30, loses to Elliott Sober by 62–60

18. Nelson Goodman  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 138–28, loses to John Earman by 67–65【记得刘华杰教授翻译过他的一本著作】

19. Patrick Suppes  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 133–20, loses to Nelson Goodman by 72–54【苏佩斯,好像有一个译本】

20. Larry Laudan  loses to Rudolf Carnap by 134–21, loses to Patrick Suppes by 58–56【劳丹,《进步及其问题》,马雷教授是专家】

2016-3-10于南方临屏涂鸦

说明:文中图片来自网络,没有任何商业目的,仅供欣赏,特此致谢!

 



https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-829-961798.html

上一篇:读者来信
下一篇:旁观
收藏 IP: 180.171.61.*| 热度|

5 袁海涛 谢平 刘钢 史晓雷 杨峰峰

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (4 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 09:27

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部