lanhan8103的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/lanhan8103

博文

回复“大修意见”(Major Revision)的模板 精选

已有 2731 次阅读 2019-11-30 03:11 |个人分类:论文写作|系统分类:论文交流| 回复审稿意见

模板1:精简版本

下面这个是小编自己以前写的一个模板,拿出来分享给大家。

Dear Editor XX and Reviewers,

Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. I really appreciate all your comments and suggestions! Please find my itemized responses in below and my revisions/corrections in the re-submitted files. (这一段基本上是套话)

Thanks again!

下面就开始回复文章的审稿意见了,一般首先是回复期刊编辑的整体意见:

SUGGESTIONS FROM EDITOR(注意这一段要把编辑原始的建议粘贴在这里,不能只有回应)
Your response to the general comments from the editor

接下来是逐条回应审稿人的建议:

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR:
Reviewer #1:
Response to the questions one by one

Reviewer #2:
Response to the questions one by one

模板2: 完整版本

这个模板是我在网上找到的,经发布者授权,转载到这里。这个模板保留了很多逐条回答审稿人的常用短语和句式,值得收藏和学习!

Dear Editor, Dear reviewers

Thank you for your letter dated February 22. We were pleased to know that our work was rated as potentially acceptable for publication in Journal, subject to adequate revision. We thank the reviewers for the time and effort that they have put into reviewing the previous version of the manuscript. Their suggestions have enabled us to improve our work. Based on the instructions provided in your letter, we uploaded the file of the revised manuscript. Accordingly, we have uploaded a copy of the original manuscript with all the changes highlighted by using the track changes mode in MS Word.

Appended to this letter is our point-by-point response to the comments raised by the reviewers. The comments are reproduced and our responses are given directly afterward in a different color (red).

We would like also to thank you for allowing us to resubmit a revised copy of the manuscript.

We hope that the revised manuscript is accepted for publication in the Journal of Mountain Science.

Sincerely,

XXXXXXX

(同样是套话,这个模板写了这么长。。。虽然小编不是很喜欢,但是适合拿来逐句学习,为己所用)


Reviewer 1:
Comments to the Author

这个审稿人的意见分为两部分:

第一部分是一般性的评论和修改建议(多为比较大的问题)。

Here are the general comments from the reviewer...
We thank the reviewer for the very interesting comment. In fact…

Regarding the suggestion about the methods, we changed this part…

Another issue on the methodological section is that...
We are grateful for the suggestion. To be more clear and in accordance with the reviewer concerns, we have added a brief description as follows: “

接下来是第二部分“小的建议”,也就是需要逐条回复的那种,一般是用词用句的修改。

Minor comments:

The title is too long, I suggest shortening. Modified throughout the text according to the comment (Line 20, page 1). Thank you for the title suggested. The precedent version of the title has been replaced, becoming...

Line 25, page 1…
Modified throughout the text according to the comment (Line 20, page 1).

Line 18, page 2… We have modified the sentence according to the previous comment (Line 30, page 2).

Line 33, page 3…
Thank you for underlining this deficiency. This section was revised and modified according to the information showed in the work suggested by the reviewer (Line 41, page 3).

Line 59, page 5…
This phrase was modified according to the comment (Line 30, page 5).

Lines 9-24, page 6… Thank you for the suggestion. We have added the information required as explained above (Lines 6-28, page 6).

Line 11, page 6…
This sentence was rephrased according to the comment (Line 8, page 6).

Line 35, page 13: “exit section”->”outlet” (please check also throughout the text, e.g. at line 54, page 13)
We have modified this expression throughout the text according to the comment.




http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-517486-1208154.html

上一篇:你所不知道的SCI, SCIE, 和ESCI

7 彭真明 王卫 强涛 单坚开 朱志敏 郑永军 丁邦平

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备14006957 )

GMT+8, 2019-12-8 00:27

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部