ChaomeiChen的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/ChaomeiChen

博文

《RMA》: Henk论期刊同行评审新指标

已有 1843 次阅读 2016-7-20 20:12 |个人分类:Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analyt|系统分类:论文交流

HYPOTHESIS & THEORY ARTICLE
Front. Res. Metr. Anal | doi: 10.3389/frma.2016.00005

Towards new indicators of a journal’s manuscript peer review process

Henk F. Moed1*

  • 1Independent researcher and scientific advisor, Netherlands

Journal impact factor (JIF) is among the most frequently used bibliometric indicators in scientific-scholarly journal and research assessment. This paper addresses the question as to why this indicator has become so attractive and pervasive. It defends the position that the most effective way to reduce the role of citation based journal metrics in journal and research assessment is developing indicators of the quality of journals’ manuscript peer review process, based on an analysis of this process itself, as reflected in the written communication between authors, referees and journal editors in electronic submission systems This approach combines computational linguistic tools from the domain of ‘digital humanities’ with ‘classical humanistic’ text analysis and a profound knowledge of the manuscript peer review and the publication process.

Keywords: Bibliometrics, Indicator development, Journal Impact Factor, manuscript peer review, research assessment

Citation: Moed HF (2016). Towards new indicators of a journal’s manuscript peer review process. Front. Res. Metr. Anal 1:5. doi: 10.3389/frma.2016.00005

Received: 05 Feb 2016; Accepted: 20 Jul 2016.

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frma.2016.00005/abstract



http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-496649-991864.html

上一篇:《Scientometrics》上的两篇科学知识图谱新论文
下一篇:CSSCI格式转换2.0

1 武夷山

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备14006957 )

GMT+8, 2020-1-24 22:39

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部