||
澳洲学者在《自然》发文,题目是《We need to talk about systematic fraud》,作者主要关注“the publication of potentially fraudulent papers in low-impact journals(低影响力期刊上发表欺诈性论文)”,但点名道姓地指控中国科学家系统性欺诈。
她说:“In 2015, I discovered several papers had been written about a gene that I and my colleagues first reported in 1998. All were by different authors based in China, but contained shared and strange irregularities. They also used highly similar language and figures. I think the papers came from third parties working for profit, fuelled by the pressure on authors to meet unrealistic publication expectations. (Such operations have been identified by investigative journalists.)(我和我的同事在1998年首次报道了一个基因,而2015年我发现关于这个基因的的几篇论文。所有这些都是来自中国的不同作者,都包含着共同的和奇怪的违规行为。他们也使用非常相似的语言和图片。我认为这些论文来自为盈利而工作的第三方,由于作者们面临着满足不切实际出版期望的压力而引发造假。(调查记者已经确认了这类行动。))”
在文章后面,她又隐晦地说:“Fraud departs from community norms, so scientists do not want to think about it, let alone talk about it. It is even more uncomfortable to think about organized fraud that is so frequently associated with one country. (欺诈违背了共同体的规范,所以科学家们不想去想它,更不用说谈论它了。更令人不安的是,考虑到经常与一个国家联系在一起的有组织的欺诈行为。)”
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-4-27 10:19
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社