Bobby的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/Bobby

博文

质疑CRISPR有缺陷的文章错了,撤稿了!

已有 1837 次阅读 2018-4-4 19:37 |个人分类:科学感想|系统分类:博客资讯

 2017年《自然。方法》上的一篇文章说基因编辑技术CRISPR有重大缺陷(An article in Nature Methods published in May 2017 suggested that CRISPR-Cas9 could have serious drawbacks.)这引起相关公司股票大跌。

现在证明,他们的质疑文章错了,说CRISPR-Cas9有缺陷完全是无事生非。他们进行了更正,原来的文章也撤下了。

(As it turned out, the scientists who wrote the article were wrong, and the scientists at the biotechs focusing on CRISPR were right. The original team that wrote the Nature Methods article posted a corrigendum (an error correction) last week on bioRxiv (pronounced "bioarchive"), a website that provides access to preprint versions of biology papers. The original online version of the initial article on Nature Methods was also subsequently retracted.)


Oops! CRISPR Concerns Turn Out to be a Big Nothingburger

https://www.yahoo.com/news/oops-crispr-concerns-turn-big-133200642.html




https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-39731-1107443.html

上一篇:寄生虫产生的蛋白质有可能缓解衰竭性疾病(外一)
下一篇:美国农业部表示CRISPR编辑食品与传统方法育成的品种一样安全
收藏 IP: 150.255.15.*| 热度|

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-25 05:34

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部