A detailed analysis of how DeepSeek R1's inference mechanism works in production, and how it differs from training-time reinforcement learning.

Training vs. Deployment: Key Questions

1. Training Phase (GRPO): Does the reinforcement learning mechanism generate multiple candidate CoT+answer sequences to optimize the policy and cultivate "slow thinking" habits?

- The answer is definitively yes.

2. Deployment Phase: Does R1 implicitly generate multiple paths during inference but only display one? If so, how does this mechanism compare to traditional ensemble methods?

3. Comparison with AlphaGo's MCTS: How does R1's mechanism fundamentally differ from Monte Carlo Tree Search?

1. Inference Mechanism in Production

DeepSeek R1's real-time reasoning can be characterized by two modes:

A. Implicit Multi-path Generation and Selection

- Generation: The model may implicitly generate multiple potential reasoning paths (CoT+Answers) during a single inference but outputs only one.

- Technical Implementation: Through decoding strategies (e.g., beam width adjustment), the model maintains multiple candidate sequences, ultimately selecting the highest-scoring path.

- User Experience: Users see only the final output, though internal multi-path exploration occurs.

- Efficiency Trade-off: Setting beam_width=1 (greedy search) defaults to single-path generation for fastest response; increasing beam width improves quality at the cost of latency.

B. Explicit Multiple Candidate Generation (Optional)

- API Control: The num_return_sequences parameter allows explicit generation of multiple candidates.

- Practical Application: While not enabled by default in the DeepSeek App, this functionality may be available through enterprise APIs or open-source implementations.

2. Training Phase: Cultivating "Slow Thinking"

A. Role of Reinforcement Learning

- Objective: GRPO algorithm trains the model to generate more detailed, logical reasoning steps (longer CoT) to maximize rewards.

- Mechanism: Training generates multiple candidate answers, with rewards evaluating both answer correctness and format correctness.

B. Driving Forces Behind CoT Growth

- Reward Design: Longer CoTs naturally emerge when they lead to better answers.

- Data Feedback: High-quality SFT data generated through rejection sampling enhances this pattern.

3. Comparison with Ensemble Methods

Similarities

- Multi-path generation conceptually similar to ensemble predictions

- Result filtering comparable to voting/weighted averaging

Key Differences

R1's implicit multi-path generation is fundamentally a dynamic decoding strategy within a single model, distinct from traditional ensemble's static combination of multiple models.

4. Fundamental Distinction from AlphaGo's MCTS

AlphaGo's MCTS

- Dynamic Programming: Builds search trees through simulation

- Online Learning: Adjusts search strategy based on real-time feedback

R1's Implicit Multi-path Generation

- Static Model: Fixed parameters during deployment

- No Reward Modeling: Path selection based on model probability rather than cumulative rewards

Key Insights

1. Training phase GRPO cultivates detailed CoT capabilities for effective single-pass inference.

2. Deployment allows flexible trade-off between single-path (for speed) and multi-path (for quality) generation.

3. While model parameters are fixed post-training, decoding strategies offer some runtime flexibility.

4. R1's multi-path generation fundamentally differs from both traditional ensembles and MCTS-style dynamic planning.

This architecture achieves a practical balance between efficiency and effectiveness for large-scale industrial applications, though it sacrifices some dynamic planning and global optimization capabilities.

#ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #DeepLearning #LLM #DeepSeek

【相关】

• 从R1幻觉谈起，大模型幻觉是缺陷还是创意火花？

• 推理强化学习是端到端的监督，推理过程的非监督

• DeepSeek R1：《少年DS之烦恼》

• 告诉李雪琴一个激发写段子灵感的秘诀：找deepseek R1

• DeepSeek 风暴下看看它的论文

• DeepSeek's R1 Paper: A Storm in AI LLM Circle

• The Turbulent Second Chapter of Large Language Models: Has Scaling Stalled?

• 大模型风云诡谲的下半场：scaling 失效？

• DeepSeek_R1 paper

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自李维科学网博客。
链接地址：https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-362400-1473059.html

上一篇：DeepSeek 笔记：R1 部署阶段的推理机制
下一篇：Reasoning Paradigm (Query+CoT+Answer) Support scaling law?