天道酬勤-许亮的博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/alvinlxu 研究领域:气动光学,图像处理,光学信息处理

博文

审稿时需要问自己的问题

已有 4085 次阅读 2011-7-21 22:02 |系统分类:科研笔记| 审稿

每次审稿时看一看,问问自己这些问题。
以下内容源自IPO的Introduction to Refereeing

Is the work understandable and correct?

   Is it clear what the authors are trying to achieve?

   Are there sufficient references to provide background and put the work in context?

   Are the results backed up with evidence? Are there any unsupported claims?

   Is the work correct? Are there any errors, flaws or mistakes in the manuscript?

   Are the mathematics or statistics correct?

  Do you understand the work?

Is the work novel and interesting?

   Are the results interesting?

   Is the research important? Do the authors explain why it is important or how it advances our understanding of the field?

   Is the work original? Does it contain new material? Have any parts of the manuscript been published before?

   How relevant is this work to researchers in your field? Would it be beneficial to get an opinion from a researcher in another field?

   Is this only an incremental advance over previous work?

Is the work well presented?

   Does the title reflect the contents of the article?

   Does the abstract contain the essential information of the article?

   Are the figures and tables correct and informative? Are there too many, or too few?

   Does the conclusion summarize what has been learned and why it is interesting and useful?

   Is it clear?

   Is the manuscript an appropriate length?



https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-347595-467074.html

上一篇:Influence of altitude on aero-optic imaging 气动光学 许亮
下一篇:写审稿报告时需要注意的事项
收藏 IP: 117.32.153.*| 热度|

4 葛德燕 张彦斌 刘钢 朱志敏

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 06:19

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部