博文
Definition of Data, Information and Knowledge in DIKWP Model
|
Definition of Data, Information and Knowledge in DIKWP Model
Yucong Duan
Benefactor: Shiming Gong
AGI-AIGC-GPT Evaluation DIKWP (Global) Laboratory
DIKWP-AC Artificial Consciousness Standardization Committee
World Conference on Artificial Consciousness
World Artificial Consciousness Association
(Email：duanyucong@hotmail.com)
Catalog
4.1 DIKW model (data-information-knowledge-wisdom)
4.2 SECI model (socialization, externalization, combination, internalization)
4.3 Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory
5 Case 5: Study on Plant Growth in Biology
6 Structured representation of knowledge
7 Cognition and construction of knowledge
8 Specific Case: Study on Planetary Motion in Astronomy
8.4 Structured representation of knowledge
9 The philosophical significance of knowledge
10 Dynamic verification and correction of knowledge
11 Conclusion of comprehensive technical report
12.1 DIKW model (data-information-knowledge-wisdom)
12.2 SECI model (socialization, externalization, combination, internalization)
12.3 Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory
12.5.2 Hypothesis and Abstraction
12.5.4 Systematic understanding
12.5.5 Dynamic verification and correction
12.5.6 Sharing and dissemination.
13 Comparison with other models
13.4 Overall Comparative Analysis of Professor Yucong Duan's Data-Information-Knowledge
14 Comparative analysis of data, information and knowledge in different spaces
14.1 Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model: the definition of three spaces
14.1.2 Semantic Space (semantic space)
14.1.3 Cognitive Space (cognitive space)
14.2 Comparative Analysis Table of Data, Information and Knowledge in Different Spaces
14.2.1 Comparative Analysis of Data
14.2.2 Comparative Analysis of Information
14.2.3 Comparative analysis of Knowledge
14.2.4 Overall Comparative Analysis of Data-Information-Knowledge
14.3 Comparison of data, information and knowledge with other models in different spaces
14.3.1 Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Space
14.3.2 Comparative Analysis of Semantic Space
14.3.3 Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Space
The concept of data In the DIKWP model, data is not only original and unprocessed facts and observation records. The concept of data is not only a simple fact or observation record, but also a cognitive object confirmed by the cognitive subject through the concept space in the cognitive process. This means that data have been classified and organized in some way before they are recognized, which makes them have a specific meaning in the conceptual space.
Semantics of data The semantics of data is a concrete manifestation of expressing the same meaning in the cognitive process. In cognitive space, data is not only a simple record, but also the result of semantic matching and probability confirmation of the cognitive objects corresponding to these data records through the classification and correspondence of conceptual space or semantic space. This processing method highlights the cognitive attribute of data in communication and thinking, that is, the meaning of data is identified and conceptually confirmed by concrete semantics through the comparison between cognitive subject and existing concepts and semantics.
For example, in a biological experiment, scientists collected growth data of various plants, including height, number of leaves, color and so on. These data are raw records in the initial stage. However, when these data are sorted, classified and input into a growth model, they are not only numerical or textual records, but also concrete expressions of plant growth. This process of classification and arrangement is the process of transforming original data into data with specific semantics.
The concept of information In the DIKWP model, information corresponds to one or more "different" semantics in the cognitive process. Information is to semantically associate the cognitive object of DIKWP in the cognitive space of the cognitive subject with the cognitive object of DIKWP in the semantic space through a specific purpose. Through this association, cognitive subjects can identify the differences in cognitive contents such as data, information, knowledge, wisdom or purpose. Through probabilistic confirmation or logical judgment, this difference forms information semantics in semantic space, or produces new semantic association in semantic space.
Semantics of information The semantics of information is to connect the cognitive content of data, information, knowledge, wisdom or purpose with the existing cognitive objects of cognitive subjects through a specific purpose, thus generating new semantic associations. In the cognitive space, this process not only includes the re-semantic combination and semantic transformation of the known DIKWP content, but also involves the generation of new cognitive understanding and information semantics through this re-combination and transformation. This process of semantic generation emphasizes the dynamic and constructive nature of information.
For example, in the above biological experiment, by analyzing and processing the growth data of plants, scientists can identify some patterns, such as the growth differences of different plants under different environmental conditions. These models are not only a simple display of data, but also contain scientists' cognitive purpose, that is, to understand and explain the internal mechanism of plant growth. Through this information processing process, scientists can transform the specific data of plant growth into information with explanatory and predictive ability.
The concept of knowledge In the DIKWP model, knowledge corresponds to one or more "complete" semantics in the cognitive space. Knowledge is to abstract the semantic integrity of DIKWP content by cognitive subjects with the help of certain assumptions, and to obtain the semantic understanding and explanation between DIKWP content of cognitive objects. This kind of understanding and explanation forms the semantic connection between the cognitive input DIKWP content of cognitive interaction activities and the existing cognitive DIKWP content, and corresponds to one or more "complete" semantics bearing complete cognitive confirmation in a higher-order cognitive space.
Semantics of knowledge The semantics of knowledge is to give "complete" semantics to some observation results through high-level cognitive activities, thus forming systematic understanding and rules. For example, it is impossible to know that all swans are white through observation, but in the cognitive space, cognitive subjects can give "complete" semantics to some observation results through assumptions (high-order cognitive activities that give complete semantics), that is, "all", and then form knowledge semantics corresponding to the knowledge rule that "swans are all white" with complete semantics.
In the case of biological experiments, scientists may find that some plants grow faster under certain conditions through long-term observation and experiments. By abstracting and assuming these observations, scientists can form the knowledge that "in high humidity environment, plant X grows faster". This kind of knowledge is not only the understanding of single information, but also the systematic understanding formed after repeated verification and correction, which can explain and predict the growth behavior of plants under different environmental conditions.
4 Comparative analysis of Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model with other knowledge definitions and models.
4.1 DIKW model (data-information-knowledge-wisdom)
Data: Original and unprocessed facts and observation records.
Information: data that has been processed and understood and given a specific meaning.
Knowledge: Further explanation and understanding of information, forming patterns and rules.
Wisdom: Use knowledge to make effective decisions and actions.
Professor Yucong Duan's definition emphasizes the dynamic generation and semantic integrity of knowledge, while DIKW model pays more attention to the hierarchical and static storage of knowledge.
Professor Duan's definition is oriented to the development from artificial intelligence to artificial consistence system, and pays attention to the high-order cognitive activities of cognitive subjects and the hypothetical generation of knowledge, while DIKW model mainly focuses on the transformation process from information to knowledge.
Professor Duan's definition emphasizes the abstraction and verification process of knowledge, while DIKW model mainly focuses on the classification and hierarchical structure of knowledge.
4.2 SECI model (socialization, externalization, combination, internalization)
Explicit knowledge: it can be transmitted by writing and coding.
Tacit knowledge: personal experience and insight, which are difficult to transmit directly.
Four processes: socialization, externalization, combination and internalization.
Professor Yucong Duan's definition emphasizes the semantic network and semantic integrity of knowledge, while SECI model pays more attention to the process of knowledge transformation and sharing.
SECI model emphasizes the interaction between explicit and implicit knowledge, while Professor Duan's definition focuses on the abstraction and verification of knowledge.
Professor Duan's definition is more suitable to describe the generation process of knowledge, while SECI model is more suitable to describe the flow and sharing of knowledge within the organization.
4.3 Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory
Explicit knowledge: it can be formalized and transmitted.
Tacit knowledge: personal experience and skills that are difficult to formalize and transmit.
Professor Yucong Duan's definition pays more attention to the semantic integrity and abstract process of knowledge, while Polanyi's theory emphasizes the importance and difficulty of transferring tacit knowledge.
Polanyi's theory pays more attention to the individuality of knowledge, and Professor Duan's definition also considers the sharing and dissemination of knowledge at the social level.
Professor Duan's definition provides a structured representation of knowledge, while Polanyi's theory emphasizes the individual experience and skills of tacit knowledge.
Five domains: simple, complex, complex, chaotic and disorderly, and the application and decision-making methods of knowledge in each domain are different.
Professor Yucong Duan's definition emphasizes the generation, verification and structuring of knowledge, while the Cynefin framework focuses on the application and decision-making of knowledge in different situations.
The framework of Cynefin is suitable for the decision-making of complex systems and problems, while Professor Duan's definition is suitable for the theoretical construction and semantic understanding of knowledge.
Professor Duan's definition provides the semantic network representation of knowledge, while the Cynefin framework provides the situational classification of knowledge application.
5 Case 5: Study on Plant Growth in Biology
Observation records: plant height, number of leaves, color, humidity, temperature, etc.
Data processing: record these raw data, classify and sort them out.
By analyzing and processing the data, the patterns and laws of plant growth are identified.
For example, identify the growth differences of plants under different humidity conditions.
Through long-term observation and experiment, a systematic understanding of plant growth law is formed.
Hypothetical formation: in high humidity environment, plant X grows faster.
Semantic integrity abstraction: abstract this observation result to form systematic knowledge.
Semantic connection construction: connecting new knowledge with existing plant growth theories.
Verification and correction: through further observation and experiment, verify and correct knowledge.
6 Structured representation of knowledge
The structural representation of knowledge emphasizes the systematicness of knowledge in cognition. In the DIKWP model, knowledge can be expressed as a semantic network:
K=(N,E)
Among them:
N represents a set of concepts.
E represents a set of relationships between concepts.
This kind of representation positions knowledge cognition as a higher cognitive achievement, emphasizing the structure of knowledge and the ability to capture complete semantics. This is very important for understanding complex systems and abstract concepts.
7 Cognition and construction of knowledge
Knowledge is the bridge of the cognitive state transformation from never understanding to understanding of DIKWP content, and the confirmation of knowledge is strengthened through verification. The construction of knowledge not only depends on the accumulation of data and information, but more importantly, it forms an understanding of the essence and internal relations of things through abstraction and generalization in the cognitive process. Knowledge exists not only at the individual level, but also at the collective or social level, and is shared and disseminated through culture, education and inheritance.
Knowledge semantics is a structured knowledge formed after deep processing and internalization of DIKWP content. This understanding is in the conceptual space and corresponds to the semantic space with the help of "complete" semantics. The definition of knowledge in the framework of DIKWP reflects a deep understanding of the world and a complete grasp of semantics. This echoes Aristotle's concept of formal reasons, that is, the essence and purpose of things can be explored and understood through reason and experience.
The formation of each knowledge rule represents the cognitive subject's cognitive grasp of the internal laws and essence of things in the DIKWP model. From the philosophical point of view, knowledge is not only the product of cognitive process, but also the purpose and guidance of this process. The formation and application of knowledge reflects the adaptation and transformation of the cognitive subject to the world, and it is a semantic space understanding of the deep-seated laws of the real world.
8 Specific Case: Study on Planetary Motion in Astronomy
We take the study of planetary motion in astronomy as an example to explain the concept and semantic generation process of knowledge in detail.
Observation records include:
The position of the planet (longitude and latitude)
The trajectory of the planet (recorded by telescopes and photographic equipment)
Time record (observation time and date)
Distance between celestial bodies (using radar ranging and other technologies)
These data are the original observation records of planetary motion.
Through the processing and interpretation of the data, the information obtained includes:
Planetary trajectory diagram
Periodicity of planetary motion
Changes in the relative positions of planets with the sun and other celestial bodies
This information is the result of data processing and interpretation, which provides a preliminary understanding of planetary motion.
The process of knowledge generation is as follows:
Observe and learn:
Through long-term observation and recording, researchers can identify the trajectory and motion law of planets.
Hypothetical formation:
Based on the observation results, the hypothesis of planetary motion is put forward. For example, Kepler put forward the hypothesis that "the orbits of planets are elliptical".
Semantic integrity abstraction:
The observation results are given "complete" semantics through assumptions, forming a systematic understanding. For example, assume that "the orbits of all planets are elliptical" and confirm this assumption through further observation and calculation.
Semantic connection construction:
Link new knowledge with existing astronomical knowledge to form a systematic knowledge structure. For example, Kepler's law and Newton's law of universal gravitation are combined to form a complete understanding of planetary motion.
Knowledge verification and correction:
Through continuous observation and calculation, the hypothesis of planetary motion is verified, and it is revised and improved according to the new observation results. For example, by observing other planets, the universality of Kepler's law is confirmed.
8.4 Structured representation of knowledge
In this case, knowledge can be expressed as a semantic network, in which nodes represent astronomical concepts and edges represent semantic relationships between concepts. For example:
Node n:
Planetary orbit (ellipse)
orbital period
universal gravitation
Edge e:
Relationship between planetary orbit and orbital period
Relationship between orbital period and universal gravitation
This structural representation helps us to understand the complex system and abstract concepts of planetary motion.
9 The philosophical significance of knowledge
In the DIKWP model, knowledge is not only a record of observations and facts, but also a systematic understanding formed through assumptions and higher-order cognitive activities. The semantic integrity and systematicness of knowledge reflect the cognitive subject's profound understanding and interpretation of the world. Through hypothesis and abstraction, researchers can reveal the deep connection and internal logic between phenomena and provide a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the world.
The process of knowledge generation is not only the integration of existing data and information, but also the assumption and abstraction, which endows the observation results with complete semantics, thus forming systematic understanding and rules. This knowledge structure can not only explain phenomena, but also predict future behaviors and characteristics, providing a deeper understanding and guidance to the world.
10 Dynamic verification and correction of knowledge
The process of knowledge generation is a dynamic process, which involves how cognitive subjects relate different DIKWP content semantics through assumptions and high-level cognitive activities to form new knowledge semantics. In the cognitive space, this process includes not only the re-semantic combination and transformation of known DIKWP content, but also the generation of new cognitive understanding and knowledge semantics through this re-combination and transformation.
This dynamic nature is reflected in the process of knowledge generation and updating. Through continuous observation, learning and verification, cognitive subjects can form and improve a systematic knowledge structure. This knowledge structure can not only explain phenomena, but also predict future behaviors and characteristics, providing a deeper understanding and guidance to the world.
11 Conclusion of comprehensive technical report
Through the above detailed analysis, we can summarize the definition and generation process of data, information and knowledge in Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model. Professor Duan's definition emphasizes the following key points:
Semantic integrity: the semantics of knowledge concepts correspond to one or more "complete" semantics in cognitive space, and semantic integrity is abstracted through assumptions and higher-order cognitive activities.
Hypothesis and abstraction: knowledge is formed by the cognitive subject's semantic integrity abstraction of DIKWP content with the help of some assumptions.
Semantic network: the semantic structure of knowledge is a semantic network, in which nodes represent concepts and edges represent semantic relationships between concepts.
Systematic understanding: knowledge is a bridge of cognitive state transformation from non-understanding to understanding of DIKWP content, which emphasizes the understanding of the essence and internal relations of things.
Dynamic verification and correction: strengthen the confirmation of knowledge through verification and correction.
Sharing and dissemination: knowledge exists not only at the individual level, but also at the collective or social level, and is shared and disseminated through culture, education and inheritance.
Compared with other knowledge definitions and models, Professor Yucong Duan's definition pays more attention to the dynamic generation and semantic integrity of knowledge, and emphasizes that knowledge is abstracted and verified through assumptions and higher-order cognitive activities in the cognitive process. This definition
It is more suitable for explaining and understanding complex systems and abstract concepts, and also emphasizes the sharing and dissemination of knowledge at the social level.
12 Analysis of knowledge definition: Professor Yucong Duan's definition and other knowledge definitions and models
12.1 DIKW model (data-information-knowledge-wisdom)
Data: Original and unprocessed facts and observation records.
Information: data that has been processed and understood and given a specific meaning.
Knowledge: Further explanation and understanding of information, forming patterns and rules.
Wisdom: Use knowledge to make effective decisions and actions.
Hierarchical vs dynamic: DIKW model emphasizes the hierarchical and static storage of knowledge, and handles data, information, knowledge and wisdom in different levels. Professor Duan's definition emphasizes the dynamic generation and semantic integrity of knowledge, and constantly generates and verifies knowledge through high-level cognitive activities.
Semantic integrity: In Professor Duan's definition, the semantic integrity of knowledge is the core, while DIKW model pays more attention to the transformation process from information to knowledge, and lacks in-depth discussion on semantic integrity.
Cognitive process: Professor Duan's definition emphasizes that cognitive subjects form knowledge through hypothesis and abstraction, while DIKW model emphasizes information processing and understanding, and less involves the deep-seated mechanism of cognitive process.
12.2 SECI model (socialization, externalization, combination, internalization)
Explicit knowledge: it can be transmitted by writing and coding.
Tacit knowledge: personal experience and insight, which are difficult to transmit directly.
Four processes: socialization (recessive to recessive), externalization (recessive to dominant), combination (dominant to dominant) and internalization (dominant to recessive).
Dynamic vs structured: SECI model emphasizes the dynamic transformation and sharing process of knowledge within the organization, and the interaction between explicit and implicit knowledge. Professor Duan's definition emphasizes the semantic network and semantic integrity of knowledge and pays more attention to the structured representation of knowledge.
Explicit and tacit knowledge: SECI model focuses on the mutual transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge. Professor Duan's definition mainly focuses on the abstraction and verification of knowledge, and does not directly distinguish explicit and tacit knowledge, but also covers their interaction.
Application scenario: SECI model is suitable for describing the knowledge flow and sharing within an organization, while Professor Duan's definition is more suitable for theoretical construction and semantic understanding of knowledge.
12.3 Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory
Explicit knowledge: it can be formalized and transmitted.
Tacit knowledge: personal experience and skills that are difficult to formalize and transmit.
Individuality vs systematicness: Polanyi's theory emphasizes the importance and difficulty of transferring tacit knowledge, and pays attention to the individuality and experience of knowledge. Professor Duan's definition focuses on the semantic integrity and abstract process of knowledge, emphasizing the systematization and structure of knowledge.
Transitivity: Polanyi's theory holds that tacit knowledge is difficult to be transmitted by formal means, while Professor Duan's definition provides a structured representation of knowledge, emphasizing the sharing and dissemination of knowledge through high-level cognitive activities.
Cognitive process: Professor Duan's definition describes the cognitive process of knowledge generation in detail, including hypothesis, abstraction and verification, while Polanyi's theory mainly focuses on individual experience and skills of knowledge.
Five domains: simple, complex, complex, chaotic and disorderly, and the application and decision-making methods of knowledge in each domain are different.
Context vs abstraction: The Cynefin framework emphasizes the application and decision-making of knowledge in different situations, and is suitable for the decision-making of complex systems and problems. Professor Duan's definition emphasizes the abstraction and verification of knowledge, which is suitable for theoretical construction and semantic understanding of knowledge.
Application scenario: The Cynefin framework is suitable for real-time decision-making and situational analysis, while Professor Duan's definition is more suitable for long-term accumulation and systematic understanding of knowledge.
Knowledge representation: The Cynefin framework classifies knowledge application modes through five domains. Professor Duan's definition provides a semantic network representation of knowledge, emphasizing the structural relationship between concepts and semantics.
Through the above detailed analysis and comparison, we can sum up the differences and advantages between Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model and other models in the definition of data, information and knowledge.
Emphasize the semantic integrity of knowledge, and form systematic understanding and rules through high-level cognitive activities. The generation of knowledge is not a simple recording and processing, but a deep understanding and abstraction of data and information.
12.5.2 Hypothesis and Abstraction
The process of knowledge generation includes hypothesis, abstraction and verification, emphasizing the dynamic generation and continuous revision of knowledge. This is in contrast with the static hierarchy of DIKW model, and it is more suitable to describe the actual generation and application process of knowledge.
The structured representation of knowledge is a semantic network, with nodes representing concepts and edges representing semantic relationships between concepts. This representation helps to understand complex systems and abstract concepts, and provides a systematic structure of knowledge.
12.5.4 Systematic understanding
Knowledge is the bridge of the cognitive state transformation from never understanding to understanding of DIKWP content, which emphasizes the profound understanding of the essence and internal relations of things. This systematic understanding can explain and predict the behavior and characteristics of phenomena.
12.5.5 Dynamic verification and correction
The process of knowledge generation and verification is dynamic. Through constant observation, experiment and verification, the confirmation and correction of knowledge are strengthened. This dynamic nature enables knowledge to be constantly improved and updated, maintaining its applicability and accuracy.
12.5.6 Sharing and dissemination.
Knowledge exists not only at the individual level, but also at the collective or social level, and is shared and disseminated through culture, education and inheritance. This sharing and dissemination mechanism ensures that knowledge can be widely used and transmitted, and promotes the development of collective wisdom.
13 Comparison with other models
DIKW model
It emphasizes the hierarchical and static storage of knowledge and is suitable for knowledge management and classification.
Professor Duan's definition pays more attention to the dynamic generation and semantic integrity of knowledge, and is suitable for describing the actual generation and application process of knowledge.
SECI model
Emphasis on the dynamic transformation and sharing process of explicit and tacit knowledge is applicable to the knowledge flow within the organization.
Professor Duan's definition provides a structured representation of knowledge, which is more suitable for describing the semantic network and abstract process of knowledge.
Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory
Emphasize the importance and difficulty of tacit knowledge, pay attention to the individuality and experience of knowledge.
Professor Duan's definition provides a systematic and structured representation of knowledge, emphasizing the sharing and dissemination of knowledge through high-level cognitive activities.
Cynefin framework
Emphasizing the application and decision-making of knowledge in different situations is suitable for real-time decision-making of complex systems and problems.
Professor Duan's definition provides a semantic network representation of knowledge, which is suitable for theoretical construction and semantic understanding of knowledge.
Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model provides a higher-order and more abstract framework in the process of defining and generating knowledge, which is suitable for explaining and understanding complex systems and abstract concepts. Compared with other models, Professor Duan's definition pays more attention to the dynamic generation and semantic integrity of knowledge, and emphasizes the deep understanding and abstraction of knowledge in the cognitive process. Through in-depth analysis and comparison of data, information and knowledge, we can see the unique advantages and applicability of DIKWP model in knowledge management and application.
13.1 Comparative analysis of Professor Yucong Duan's knowledge definition and other knowledge definitions and models
characteristic | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition of Knowledge | DIKW model | SECI model | Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory | Cynefin framework |
definition | The semantics of knowledge concepts correspond to one or more "complete" semantics in cognitive space, and the semantic integrity is abstracted through assumptions and higher-order cognitive activities. | Knowledge is processed and understood information, which can be used for decision-making and action. | Knowledge is divided into explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge, which are transformed through four processes: socialization, externalization, combination and internalization. | Knowledge is divided into explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge, and tacit knowledge is personal experience and skills that are difficult to formalize and transmit. | The application of knowledge in different situations is different, and it is divided into five domains: simple, complex, complex, chaotic and disorderly. |
Key features | Semantic integrity, hypothesis and abstraction, semantic network, systematic understanding, dynamic verification and correction, sharing and dissemination. | Hierarchical and static, emphasizing the storage and management of knowledge. | Dynamic and dual (mutual transformation between explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge). | It is difficult to formalize and individualize, emphasizing personal experience and skills. | Situational and diverse, emphasizing that the application of knowledge and decision-making change according to different situations. |
Semantic integrity | Emphasis is placed on forming complete semantics and constructing systematic understanding through assumptions and abstract activities. | Do not emphasize, mainly pay attention to the transformation process from information to knowledge. | Part emphasizes the formation of systematic understanding through the transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge. | Do not emphasize, mainly pay attention to the individuality and difficult transmission of tacit knowledge. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the application of knowledge in different situations. |
Knowledge generation process | Observation and learning, hypothesis formation, semantic integrity abstraction, semantic connection construction, knowledge verification and correction. | Information processing and understanding, pattern recognition and formation rules. | Socialization, externalization, combination and internalization. | Tacit knowledge is formed through personal experience and skills, and it is difficult to transmit it directly. | Knowledge generation makes decisions according to different situations, and its application methods are different. |
knowledge representation | In semantic network, nodes represent concepts and edges represent semantic relationships between concepts. | Hierarchical structure, from data to information to knowledge and wisdom. | Dynamic transformation process, mutual transformation of explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge. | Personal experience and skills that are difficult to formalize are not easily transmitted through documents. | There are five domains, and the application and decision-making methods of knowledge in each domain are different. |
Static vs. dynamic | Dynamic, emphasizing the generation, verification and correction of knowledge. | Static, mainly focusing on the level and storage of knowledge. | Dynamic, emphasizing the process of knowledge transformation and sharing. | Static, mainly focusing on the individuality and difficulty of transferring tacit knowledge. | Dynamic, knowledge application changes according to the situation. |
Individuality vs. sociality | Emphasis is placed on the sharing and dissemination of knowledge at the individual and social levels through culture, education and inheritance. | Focus on the personal level of knowledge, not on the social level. | Emphasize the sociality of knowledge, through the transformation and sharing process within the organization. | Emphasize the individuality of knowledge, focusing on personal experience and skills. | Emphasizing the application of knowledge in different situations is suitable for the decision-making of complex systems and problems. |
Abstraction and generalization | Emphasize that systematic knowledge is formed through higher-order cognitive activities and assumptions. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the processing and understanding of information. | Part emphasizes the formation of systematic understanding through the transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge. | Do not emphasize, mainly pay attention to the individuality and difficult transmission of tacit knowledge. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the application of knowledge and decision-making methods. |
Verification and correction | It is emphasized that the correctness and validity of the hypothesis are verified by further observation and experiment, and it is revised and improved according to the new information. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the storage and management of knowledge. | Emphasis is placed on verifying and perfecting knowledge through continuous knowledge transformation and sharing process. | Do not emphasize, mainly pay attention to the individuality and difficult transmission of tacit knowledge. | Emphasis is placed on the application and decision-making of knowledge according to different situations to verify its effectiveness. |
Philosophical significance | Knowledge is the profound understanding and interpretation of the world by cognitive subjects, and it forms systematic knowledge through abstraction and generalization. | Knowledge is the further processing and understanding of information, mainly focusing on its application and decision-making function. | Knowledge is the mutual transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge, which is formed through sharing and dissemination within the organization. | Knowledge is the embodiment of personal experience and skills, and it is difficult to transfer it through formal means. | Knowledge is a means of decision-making and application according to the situation, emphasizing its diversity and situational adaptability. |
Through comparative analysis, we can see that Professor Yucong Duan's knowledge definition emphasizes the semantic integrity, abstract process, dynamic verification and semantic network structure of knowledge on the basis of the existing knowledge model. Compared with other models, Professor Duan's definition pays more attention to the process of knowledge generation and verification, and emphasizes the understanding of the essence and internal relations of things. This definition is more suitable for explaining and understanding complex systems and abstract concepts, and also emphasizes the sharing and dissemination of knowledge at the social level.
Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model provides a high-order, dynamic and structured framework for the generation and application of knowledge, so that it can better adapt to the understanding and interpretation of complex systems and abstract concepts. Through in-depth analysis and comparison of data, information and knowledge, we can see the unique advantages and applicability of DIKWP model in knowledge management and application. This provides a new perspective and method for knowledge management, education and research, and promotes knowledge sharing, dissemination and application.
13.2 Comparative Analysis of Professor Yucong Duan's Data Definition and Other Data Definitions and Models
characteristic | Professor Yucong Duan's Data Definition | DIKW model | SECI model | Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory | Cynefin framework |
definition | The original facts or observation records confirmed by the cognitive subject, and the cognitive object confirmed by the conceptual space. | Original and unprocessed facts and observation records. | Original facts and records. | Tacit knowledge does not explicitly involve data. | Data has different applications in different domains. |
semantics | Semantic matching and confirmation are carried out through conceptual space or semantic space. | The original record before giving a specific meaning. | As part of explicit knowledge. | Tacit knowledge focuses on personal experience and does not involve data. | Does not explicitly involve semantic processing of data. |
Static vs. dynamic | Static, through the confirmation of cognitive subject. | Static, as the basis of knowledge generation. | Static as a part of explicit knowledge. | Static, focusing on personal experience and skills. | Static, processing according to different domains. |
Treatment process | Classification and organization through cognitive subjects. | Convert into information through processing and understanding. | Through the process of socialization. | Unclear treatment process. | The data is applied according to the situation. |
Individuality vs. sociality | Data processing is mainly embodied in the process of individual cognition. | Individual processing, emphasizing data accumulation. | Handling and sharing in the process of socialization. | Mainly concerned with individual experience, not involving sociality. | Individual or collective treatment according to the situation. |
13.3 Comparative Analysis of Professor Yucong Duan's Information Definition and Other Information Definitions and Models
characteristic | Definition of Professor Yucong Duan | DIKW model | SECI model | Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory | Cynefin framework |
definition | Through the purpose of cognitive subject, the data is semantically associated with existing cognitive objects to identify differences. | The processed and understood data is endowed with specific meaning. | Part of transforming tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge. | Tacit knowledge is difficult to be clearly transformed into information. | Information has different applications in different domains. |
semantics | New information semantics are formed through semantic matching and association. | The result of data processing and understanding. | The externalization result of explicit knowledge. | Mainly concerned with tacit knowledge, limited information transmission. | Semantic processing of ambiguous information. |
Static vs. dynamic | Dynamic, generated and verified by the purpose of cognitive subject. | Static, as the basis of knowledge generation. | Dynamic, emphasizing the interaction between explicit and tacit knowledge. | Mainly concerned with tacit knowledge, less information processing. | Dynamic, processing and application according to the situation. |
Treatment process | Through the purpose and cognitive process of cognitive subject, a new semantic association is formed. | By processing and understanding data, information is formed. | Through the process of externalization, tacit knowledge is transformed into explicit knowledge. | Mainly through personal experience and skills transfer. | Information is processed and applied according to the situation. |
Individuality vs. sociality | Information processing involves both individuals and social sharing and communication. | Give priority to individual processing, emphasizing information accumulation. | Handling and sharing in the process of socialization. | Mainly concerned with individual experience, limited information transmission. | Individual or collective treatment according to the situation. |
13.4 Overall Comparative Analysis of Professor Yucong Duan's Data-Information-Knowledge
characteristic | Definition of Professor Yucong Duan | DIKW model | SECI model | Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory | Cynefin framework |
Static vs. dynamic | Emphasize the dynamic generation and verification process, and the generation and application of knowledge is continuous. | Static storage of data, information and knowledge, emphasizing hierarchy. | Emphasize the dynamic transformation and sharing process of knowledge. | The individuality and experience of tacit knowledge are difficult to formalize. | Emphasize the dynamic application of knowledge and situational adaptability. |
Individuality vs. sociality | Emphasize the individual and social sharing of knowledge and spread it through culture and education. | Data and information are mainly handled by individuals, and knowledge is applied to individual decision-making. | Emphasize the transformation and sharing of knowledge within the organization. | Knowledge is mainly personal experience and skills, and it is difficult to socialize. | Knowledge is applied individually or collectively according to the situation. |
Abstraction and generalization | Emphasize the formation of systematic knowledge through higher-order cognitive activities and assumptions. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the processing and understanding of information. | Part emphasizes the formation of systematic understanding through the transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge. | Do not emphasize, mainly pay attention to the individuality and difficult transmission of tacit knowledge. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the application of knowledge and decision-making methods. |
Verification and correction | It is emphasized that the correctness and validity of the hypothesis are verified by observation and experiment, and it is revised and improved according to the new information. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the storage and management of knowledge. | Emphasis is placed on verifying and perfecting knowledge through the continuous process of knowledge transformation and sharing. | Do not emphasize, mainly pay attention to the individuality and difficult transmission of tacit knowledge. | It emphasizes the application and decision-making of knowledge according to different situations to verify its effectiveness. |
Philosophical significance | Knowledge is the profound understanding and interpretation of the world by cognitive subjects, and it forms systematic knowledge through abstraction and generalization. | Knowledge is the further processing and understanding of information, mainly focusing on its application and decision-making function. | Knowledge is the mutual transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge, which is formed through sharing and dissemination within the organization. | Knowledge is the embodiment of personal experience and skills, and it is difficult to transfer it through formal means. | Knowledge is a means of decision-making and application according to the situation, emphasizing its diversity and situational adaptability. |
14 Comparative analysis of data, information and knowledge in different spaces
14.1 Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model: the definition of three spaces
Definition: Conceptual space is a space for cognitive subjects to communicate and recognize through natural language, symbols and other forms. In this space, data, information and knowledge exist as concrete concepts and are expressed through semantic networks and concept maps.
Function: Help cognitive subjects to classify and organize specific facts and observations, and form systematic understanding and rules.
14.1.2 Semantic Space (semantic space)
Definition: Semantic space is the space where cognitive subjects understand and deal with the internal semantic relations of concepts. In this space, cognitive subjects understand and generate new knowledge through semantic matching, association and transformation.
Function: to form new semantic relations through semantic matching and association, so as to generate and verify knowledge.
14.1.3 Cognitive Space (cognitive space)
Definition: Cognitive space is the internal psychological space for cognitive subjects to think, learn and understand. In this space, cognitive subjects form a profound understanding and explanation of the world through cognitive activities such as observation, hypothesis, abstraction and verification.
Function: Transform data and information into systematic knowledge through high-level cognitive activities, and constantly improve and update knowledge in the process of dynamic verification and correction.
14.2 Comparative Analysis Table of Data, Information and Knowledge in Different Spaces
14.2.1 Comparative Analysis of Data
characteristic | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Conceptual Space) | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Semantic Space) | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Cognitive Space) |
definition | The original facts or observation records confirmed by the cognitive subject, and the cognitive object confirmed by the conceptual space. | The data confirmed by semantic matching and association have specific semantic attributes. | Through the thinking and classification of cognitive subjects, concrete observation records and facts are formed. |
function | Classify and organize specific facts and observations. | Form the semantic connection of data to ensure the consistency of data in the cognitive process. | Through thinking and classification, a preliminary cognitive object is formed. |
Static vs. dynamic | Static, through the confirmation of cognitive subject. | Dynamic, processed through semantic matching and association. | Dynamic, processing and classification through cognitive activities. |
Treatment process | Classification and organization through cognitive subjects. | Through semantic matching and association in semantic space. | Through the thinking and classification of cognitive space. |
14.2.2 Comparative Analysis of Information
characteristic | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Conceptual Space) | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Semantic Space) | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Cognitive Space) |
definition | Through the purpose of cognitive subject, the data is semantically associated with existing cognitive objects to identify differences. | New information semantics are formed through semantic matching and association, and differences of data are identified. | Through the purpose and cognitive process of the cognitive subject, new semantic associations and information are formed. |
function | Help cognitive subjects identify differences and connections between data. | Form new semantic connections to ensure the consistency of information in the cognitive process. | Through cognitive process, new cognitive understanding and information are formed. |
Static vs. dynamic | Dynamic, generated and verified by the purpose of cognitive subject. | Dynamic, processed through semantic matching and association. | Dynamic, processing and classification through cognitive activities. |
Treatment process | Through the purpose and cognitive process of cognitive subject, a new semantic association is formed. | Through semantic matching and association of semantic space, new information semantics are formed. | Through the thinking and purpose of cognitive space, new cognition and information are formed. |
14.2.3 Comparative analysis of Knowledge
characteristic | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Conceptual Space) | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Semantic Space) | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Cognitive Space) |
definition | The semantics of knowledge concept corresponds to one or more "complete" semantics in cognitive space. | Form systematic understanding and rules through semantic matching and association. | Form systematic knowledge and understanding through high-level cognitive activities and assumptions. |
function | Form systematic concepts and rules to help cognitive subjects understand and explain the world. | Form a systematic semantic connection to ensure the consistency of knowledge in the cognitive process. | Through cognitive activities, a profound understanding and explanation of the world is formed. |
Static vs. dynamic | Dynamic, knowledge generation and verification is a continuous process. | Dynamic, verified and corrected through semantic matching and association. | Dynamic, verified and corrected through cognitive activities. |
Treatment process | Through observation, hypothesis, abstraction, verification and correction, systematic knowledge is formed. | Knowledge is formed and verified through semantic matching and association in semantic space. | Knowledge is formed and verified through higher-order cognitive activities in cognitive space. |
14.2.4 Overall Comparative Analysis of Data-Information-Knowledge
characteristic | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Conceptual Space) | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Semantic Space) | Professor Yucong Duan's Definition (Cognitive Space) |
data | The original facts or observation records confirmed by the cognitive subject, and the cognitive object confirmed by the conceptual space. | The data confirmed by semantic matching and association have specific semantic attributes. | Through the thinking and classification of cognitive subjects, concrete observation records and facts are formed. |
information | Through the purpose of cognitive subject, the data is semantically associated with existing cognitive objects to identify differences. | New information semantics are formed through semantic matching and association, and differences of data are identified. | Through the purpose and cognitive process of the cognitive subject, new semantic associations and information are formed. |
knowledge | The semantics of knowledge concept corresponds to one or more "complete" semantics in cognitive space. | Form systematic understanding and rules through semantic matching and association. | Form systematic knowledge and understanding through high-level cognitive activities and assumptions. |
Semantic integrity | Form a systematic understanding through high-level cognitive activities. | Semantic integrity is formed through semantic matching and association. | Semantic integrity is formed through cognitive activities and assumptions. |
Treatment process | Data are classified and organized by cognitive subjects; Information is formed through purpose and cognitive process; Knowledge is formed by hypothesis, abstraction and verification. | Data is confirmed by semantic matching and association; Information is formed through semantic association; Knowledge is formed through semantic verification and revision. | Data are classified through cognitive activities; Information is formed through cognitive purpose; Knowledge is formed and verified through high-level cognitive activities. |
Static vs. dynamic | Emphasize the dynamic generation and verification process, and the generation and application of knowledge is continuous. | Emphasis is placed on the dynamic nature of semantic matching and association, and the generation and verification of knowledge is continuous. | Emphasize the dynamic nature of cognitive activities, and the generation and verification of knowledge is continuous. |
Individuality vs. sociality | Emphasize the individual and social sharing of knowledge and spread it through culture and education. | Emphasize the individuality and sociality of semantic connection, and spread it through semantic association and sharing. | Emphasize the individuality and sociality of cognitive activities and spread them through cognitive processes. |
Abstraction and generalization | Form systematic knowledge through higher-order cognitive activities and assumptions. | Form a systematic understanding through semantic matching and association. | Form a systematic understanding through cognitive activities and assumptions. |
Verification and correction | The correctness and validity of the hypothesis are verified by observation and experiment, and it is revised and improved according to the new information. | Correct knowledge through semantic verification and association, and improve it according to new information. | Verify and correct knowledge through cognitive activities and improve it according to new information. |
Philosophical significance | Knowledge is the profound understanding and interpretation of the world by cognitive subjects, and it forms systematic knowledge through abstraction and generalization. | Knowledge is a systematic understanding formed through semantic connection and matching, which reflects the cognitive subject's semantic cognition of the world. | Knowledge is formed through high-order cognitive activities and assumptions, and it is a profound understanding and explanation of the world. |
14.3 Comparison of data, information and knowledge with other models in different spaces
14.3.1 Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Space
characteristic | Definition of Professor Yucong Duan | DIKW model | SECI model | Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory | Cynefin framework |
data definition | The original facts or observation records confirmed by the cognitive subject, and the cognitive object confirmed by the conceptual space. | Original and unprocessed facts and observation records. | Original facts and records. | Tacit knowledge does not explicitly involve data. | Data has different applications in different domains. |
Information definition | Through the purpose of cognitive subject, the data is semantically associated with existing cognitive objects to identify differences. | The processed and understood data is endowed with specific meaning. | Part of transforming tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge. | Tacit knowledge is difficult to be clearly transformed into information. | Information has different applications in different domains. |
Knowledge definition | The semantics of knowledge concept corresponds to one or more "complete" semantics in cognitive space, which is formed through assumptions and higher-order cognitive activities. | The processed and understood information can be used for decision-making and action. | Knowledge is divided into explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge, which are generated through transformation. | Tacit knowledge is personal experience and skill, which is difficult to formalize. | Knowledge is applied according to different situations. |
Static vs. dynamic | Emphasize the dynamic generation and verification process, and the generation and application of knowledge is continuous. | Static storage of data, information and knowledge, emphasizing hierarchy. | Emphasize the dynamic transformation and sharing process of knowledge. | The individuality and experience of tacit knowledge are difficult to formalize. | Emphasize the dynamic application of knowledge and situational adaptability. |
Individuality vs. sociality | Emphasize the individual and social sharing of knowledge and spread it through culture and education. | Data and information are mainly handled by individuals, and knowledge is applied to individual decision-making. | Emphasize the transformation and sharing of knowledge within the organization. | Knowledge is mainly personal experience and skills, and it is difficult to socialize. | Knowledge is applied individually or collectively according to the situation. |
Abstraction and generalization | Form systematic knowledge through higher-order cognitive activities and assumptions. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the processing and understanding of information. | Part emphasizes the formation of systematic understanding through the transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge. | Do not emphasize, mainly pay attention to the individuality and difficult transmission of tacit knowledge. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the application of knowledge and decision-making methods. |
Verification and correction | The correctness and validity of the hypothesis are verified by observation and experiment, and it is revised and improved according to the new information. | Do not emphasize, mainly focus on the storage and management of knowledge. | Emphasis is placed on verifying and perfecting knowledge through the continuous process of knowledge transformation and sharing. | Do not emphasize, mainly pay attention to the individuality and difficult transmission of tacit knowledge. | It emphasizes the application and decision-making of knowledge according to different situations to verify its effectiveness. |
Philosophical significance | Knowledge is the profound understanding and interpretation of the world by cognitive subjects, and it forms systematic knowledge through abstraction and generalization. | Knowledge is the further processing and understanding of information, mainly focusing on its application and decision-making function. | Knowledge is the mutual transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge, which is formed through sharing and dissemination within the organization. | Knowledge is the embodiment of personal experience and skills, and it is difficult to transfer it through formal means. | Knowledge is a means of decision-making and application according to the situation, emphasizing its diversity and situational adaptability. |
14.3.2 Comparative Analysis of Semantic Space
characteristic | Definition of Professor Yucong Duan | DIKW model | SECI model | Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory | Cynefin framework |
data definition | The data confirmed by semantic matching and association have specific semantic attributes. | The original data is semantically labeled in the semantic space. | Data is semantically labeled by explicit knowledge in the process of transformation. | Tacit knowledge is mainly embodied by implicit semantics in personal experience. | Data are semantically labeled and processed according to different situations. |
Information definition | New information semantics are formed through semantic matching and association, and differences of data are identified. | After data processing, it is given a specific meaning to form the semantics of information. | Information is semantically labeled in the externalization of explicit knowledge. | Tacit knowledge is expressed as information through implied semantics and context. | Information is semantically labeled and processed according to different situations. |
Knowledge definition | Form systematic understanding and rules through semantic matching and association. | Information forms the semantics of knowledge through semantic association. | Knowledge forms semantic association in the process of transformation between explicit and implicit knowledge. | Tacit knowledge forms deep understanding mainly through implied semantics. | Knowledge is semantically associated and processed according to different situations. |
Static vs. dynamic | Dynamic, processed and verified through semantic matching and association. | The semantic association of knowledge is relatively static, mainly focusing on hierarchy. | Dynamic, semantic processing through the interaction of explicit and tacit knowledge. | The implicit semantics of knowledge is dynamic and difficult to formalize. | Emphasize the dynamic processing and situational adaptability of knowledge semantics. |
Individuality vs. sociality | Emphasize the individuality and sociality of semantic connection, and spread it through semantic association and sharing. | The semantic relevance of knowledge is mainly at the individual level, and its sociality is weak. | Emphasis is placed on semantic transformation and sharing of knowledge and sociality. | The implied semantics of knowledge is mainly at the individual level, which is difficult to socialize. | Knowledge semantics is related and processed individually or collectively according to the situation. |
Abstraction and generalization | Form a systematic understanding through semantic matching and association. | Abstraction and generalization through hierarchical semantic association. | Abstraction and generalization through the transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge. | Abstraction and generalization through deep understanding of implied semantics. | Semantic abstraction and generalization according to the situation. |
Verification and correction | Correct knowledge through semantic verification and association, and improve it according to new information. | The semantic verification and correction of knowledge is weak, mainly relying on static level. | Emphasize the semantic transformation and verification process of knowledge, and improve it through interaction. | Semantic verification of tacit knowledge is difficult to formalize and depends on personal experience. | Semantic verification and correction of knowledge are carried out according to the situation. |
Philosophical significance | Knowledge is a systematic understanding formed through semantic connection and matching, which reflects the cognitive subject's semantic cognition of the world. | The semantics of knowledge is mainly formed after information processing, and its application and decision-making function are concerned. | Knowledge is a semantic connection formed through the transformation and sharing of explicit and implicit knowledge. | The implied semantics of knowledge is mainly embodied through personal experience, and it is difficult to formally transmit it. | The semantics of knowledge are related according to the situation, emphasizing its diversity and situational adaptability. |
14.3.3 Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Space
characteristic | Definition of Professor Yucong Duan | DIKW model | SECI model | Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory | Cynefin framework |
data definition | Through the thinking and classification of cognitive subjects, concrete observation records and facts are formed. | Raw data are classified and processed through cognitive activities. | Data is transformed into explicit knowledge in the cognitive process. | Tacit knowledge is mainly embodied through personal experience and implicit cognitive activities. | The data is cognitively processed according to different situations. |
Information definition | Through the purpose and cognitive process of the cognitive subject, new semantic associations and information are formed. | Information is processed and understood through cognitive activities. | Information is externalized into explicit knowledge in the cognitive process. | Information is transmitted through tacit knowledge and personal experience. | Information is cognitively processed according to different situations. |
Knowledge definition | Form systematic knowledge and understanding through high-level cognitive activities and assumptions. | Information is processed and understood to form knowledge for decision-making and action. | Knowledge is generated through cognitive activities and the transformation of explicit and implicit knowledge. | Knowledge is deeply understood mainly through tacit knowledge and personal experience. | Knowledge is cognitively processed and applied according to different situations. |
Static vs. dynamic | Dynamic, verified and corrected through cognitive activities. | Static storage and hierarchical management of knowledge. | Dynamic, cognitive processing through the interaction of explicit and tacit knowledge. | The implicit cognition of knowledge is dynamic and difficult to formalize. | Emphasize the dynamic cognition and situational adaptability of knowledge. |
Individuality vs. sociality | Emphasize the individuality and sociality of cognitive activities and spread them through cognitive processes. | Knowledge is mainly handled at the individual level, but less at the social level. | Emphasize the cognitive transformation and sharing of knowledge in the organization, and pay attention to sociality. | Knowledge is mainly processed through individual experience and tacit cognition. | The cognition of knowledge is handled individually or collectively according to the situation. |
Abstraction and generalization | Form a systematic understanding through cognitive activities and assumptions. | Knowledge is formed by abstraction and generalization after information processing. | Abstract and summarize through the cognitive transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge. | Abstraction and generalization through tacit knowledge and personal experience. | Cognitive abstraction and generalization according to the situation. |
Verification and correction | Verify and correct knowledge through cognitive activities and improve it according to new information. | Knowledge verification and correction are less, mainly relying on static storage. | Emphasize the cognitive transformation and verification of knowledge, and correct it through interaction. | The verification of knowledge is difficult to formalize, mainly through personal experience. | Knowledge is verified and corrected according to the situation. |
Philosophical significance | Knowledge is formed through high-order cognitive activities and assumptions, and it is a profound understanding and explanation of the world. | Knowledge is the result of further processing and understanding of information, which is mainly used for decision-making. | Knowledge is formed through the cognitive interaction and transformation of explicit and implicit knowledge. | Knowledge is deeply understood mainly through implicit cognition and personal experience, which is difficult to formalize. | Knowledge is recognized according to the situation, emphasizing its diversity and situational adaptability. |
In the conceptual space, Professor Yucong Duan's definition emphasizes that data, information and knowledge are classified and organized through the confirmation of cognitive subjects, purpose and higher-order cognitive activities, forming systematic understanding and rules. Compared with other models, Professor Duan's definition pays more attention to the dynamic generation and verification process of knowledge and emphasizes the individual and social sharing of knowledge.
In the semantic space, Professor Yucong Duan's definition forms systematic understanding and rules of data, information and knowledge through semantic matching and association. In contrast, DIKW model focuses on hierarchical semantic association, SECI model emphasizes the transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge, Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory focuses on the implicit semantics of personal experience, and Cynefin framework deals with semantics according to situations.
In the cognitive space, Professor Yucong Duan's definition forms systematic knowledge and understanding through high-level cognitive activities and assumptions. Compared with other models, DIKW model pays attention to the static storage and hierarchical management of knowledge, SECI model emphasizes the interaction and transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge, Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory focuses on personal experience and tacit cognition, and Cynefin framework carries out dynamic cognitive processing according to the situation.
Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model provides a higher-order, dynamic and structured framework for the definition of data, information and knowledge by distinguishing conceptual space, semantic space and cognitive space in detail. Compared with other knowledge definitions and models, Professor Duan's definition pays more attention to the dynamic generation, verification and revision of knowledge, and emphasizes the individual and social sharing of knowledge, which is suitable for the understanding and interpretation of complex systems and abstract concepts.
Through comparative analysis, this comprehensive technical report shows the unique advantages and applicability of Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model in the definition of data, information and knowledge, provides a new perspective and method for knowledge management, education and research, and promotes the sharing, dissemination and application of knowledge.
Through comparative analysis, we discuss the definitions of data, information and knowledge in Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model in detail, and compare it with other main knowledge definitions and models. Professor Duan's definition emphasizes the dynamic generation of knowledge, semantic integrity, hypothesis and abstraction, and the process of verification and correction. This definition is not only suitable for theoretical construction and semantic understanding of knowledge, but also provides a new perspective and method for knowledge management and application.
When comparing other models, we found that:
DIKW model focuses on the hierarchical and static storage of knowledge, while Professor Duan's definition emphasizes the dynamic generation and verification of knowledge.
SECI model emphasizes the interaction and transformation of explicit and tacit knowledge, which is suitable for the knowledge flow within the organization, while Professor Duan's definition provides a structured representation of knowledge and is more suitable for describing the generation process of knowledge.
Polanyi's tacit knowledge theory pays attention to the individuality and difficult transmission of tacit knowledge, while Professor Duan's definition emphasizes the systematic and structured representation of knowledge.
The framework of Cynefin emphasizes the application and decision-making of knowledge in different situations, which is suitable for real-time decision-making of complex systems and problems. Professor Duan's definition provides a semantic network representation of knowledge, which is suitable for theoretical construction and semantic understanding of knowledge.
Generally speaking, Professor Yucong Duan's DIKWP model provides a high-order, dynamic and structured framework in the process of knowledge definition and generation, which is better adapted to the understanding and interpretation of complex systems and abstract concepts. Compared with other models, Professor Duan's definition not only pays attention to the process of knowledge generation and verification, but also emphasizes the sharing and dissemination of knowledge at the social level, which embodies the importance and role of knowledge in individual and collective cognition.
[1] Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
[2] Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday & Company.
[3] Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.
[4] Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
[5] Choo, C. W. (1998). The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions. Oxford University Press.
[6] Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
[7] Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
[8] Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021-1046.
[9] Spender, J.-C. (1996). Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 45-62.
[10] Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55-79.
[11] Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is Organizational Knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973-993.
[12] Dretske, F. I. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. MIT Press.
[13] Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing Codified Knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.
[14] Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
[15] Schultze, U., & Leidner, D. E. (2002). Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Research: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 213-242.
[16] Boisot, M. (1998). Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy. Oxford University Press.
[17] Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
[18] Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
[19] Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106-116.
[20] von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
[21] Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits. Communications of the AIS, 1(2es), 1.
[22] Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381-400.
[23] Cross, R., & Sproull, L. (2004). More than an Answer: Information Relationships for Actionable Knowledge. Organization Science, 15(4), 446-462.
[24] Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125-134.
[25] Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
[26] Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1179-1208.
[27] McDermott, R. (1999). Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 41(4), 103-117.
[28] Earl, M. (2001). Knowledge Management Strategies: Toward a Taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 215-233.
[29] Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley.
[30] Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday/Currency.
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1435406.html
上一篇：段玉聪教授DIKWP数理系统的语义完备性及数理特性
下一篇：Application of Definition of Data, Information and Knowledge
0
该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)
1/0 | 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閻愵剙鍔ょ紓宥咃躬瀵鎮㈤崗灏栨嫽闁诲酣娼ф竟濠偽ｉ鍓х＜闁绘劦鍓欓崝銈囩磽瀹ュ拑韬€殿喖顭烽幃銏ゅ礂鐏忔牗瀚介梺璇查叄濞佳勭珶婵犲伣锝夘敊閸撗咃紲闂佺粯鍔﹂崜娆撳礉閵堝洨纾界€广儱鎷戦煬顒傗偓娈垮枛椤兘骞冮姀銈呯閻忓繑鐗楃€氫粙姊虹拠鏌ュ弰婵炰匠鍕彾濠电姴浼ｉ敐澶樻晩闁告挆鍜冪床闂備胶绮崝锕傚礈濞嗘挸绀夐柕鍫濇缁♀偓闂侀€炲苯澧撮柡灞芥椤撳ジ宕ㄩ姘曞┑锛勫亼閸婃牜鏁幒妤€纾圭憸鐗堝笒閸氬綊鏌嶈閸撶喖寮婚敐鍡樺劅闁靛繒濮村В鍫ユ⒑閸涘﹦鎳冮柛鐕佸亰閹儳鐣￠幍顔芥闂佹悶鍎滅仦缁㈡％闂備浇顕ч崙鐣屽緤婵犳艾绀夐悗锝庘偓顖嗗吘鏃堝川椤旇瀚奸梻渚€娼荤€靛矂宕㈡總绋跨閻庯綆鍠楅悡鏇㈡煏婵炲灝鍔ょ紒澶庢閳ь剝顫夊ú姗€宕濆▎鎾崇畺婵炲棗娴氶崯鍛亜閺冨洦顥夐柣锔界矒濮婄粯绗熼埀顒€岣胯閹囧幢濡炪垺绋戣灃闁告劦浜為悾鍫曟⒑閸︻厼鍔嬮柟姝屽煐缁傚秴饪伴崼鐔哄弳闂佸搫鍊藉▔鏇熺閵忊懇鍋撶憴鍕碍婵☆偅鐩崺鈧い鎺嶇贰閸熷繘鏌涢悩鎰佹疁闁诡噯绻濋弫鎾绘偐椤旂懓浜惧〒姘ｅ亾鐎殿噮鍣ｅ畷鐓庘攽鐎ｎ亝鏆梻鍌欒兌缁垶寮婚妸銉殨闁告挷璁查崑鎾愁潩椤戞儳浠┑顔硷功缁垶骞忛崨鏉戝窛濠电姴鍊瑰▓妯肩磽閸屾瑦绁版い鏇嗗洤纾瑰┑鐘宠壘閻掑灚銇勯幒宥囶槮闁搞値鍓熼弻娑㈡晲韫囨洜袦閻庤娲樺鑺ユ叏閳ь剟鏌嶉妷銉э紞缂佹劗鍋ゅ楦裤亹閹烘垳鍠婇梺鍛婏耿缁犳牕鐣烽姀銈呯闁绘劏鏅滈弬鈧梻浣哥枃濡嫬螞濡ゅ懏鍊堕柣妯肩帛閻撶喖鐓崶銊︹拻缂佺姵鐗滅槐鎺楀磼濮樻瘷褏鈧娲滈崗姗€銆佸鈧幃鈺冨枈婢跺苯绨ユ繝纰夌磿閸嬫垿宕愰弽顬稒绗熼埀顒€鐣烽幋锕€绠涙い鎾跺枑閻濈兘姊洪幐搴㈩棃闁轰緡鍣ｅ畷鎴﹀箻閼搁潧鏋傞梺鍛婃处閸撴盯藝閵夆晜鈷戦梻鍫熺〒婢ф盯鏌熼鐓庘偓鍧楁偘椤曗偓瀹曟﹢顢欑喊杈ㄧ秱闂備線娼х换鍫ュ垂婵犳碍鍋傞柟鍓х帛閳锋垿鏌涢幘鐟扮毢闁告ɑ鐩弻娑㈡偐閾忣偆顦┑鈥冲级閸旀瑩骞冮姀顫剨濞达綀顫夐弶鎼佹⒒娴ｈ櫣甯涢拑閬嶆煕閹炬潙鍝虹€规洦鍨电粻娑樷槈濞嗘垵骞堥梻浣虹帛钃遍柛鎾磋壘閳绘挸饪伴崼鐔哄帾闂佺硶鍓濋〃鍛村汲閿濆洠鍋撶憴鍕８闁告梹鍨块妴浣割潨閳ь剙鐣烽崼鏇炍╃憸澶娢ｉ崼銉︾叄缂備焦岣挎晶鐢告煛鐏炲墽鈽夐柍钘夘樀瀹曪繝鎮欓懠顒夊晪濠碉紕鍋戦崐褏鈧潧鐭傚畷鎶芥晲閸滀焦缍庡┑鐐叉▕娴滄粎绮绘导鏉戠婵烇綆鍓欓悘顔姐亜閿斿搫鍔︽慨濠呮缁瑩宕犻垾鍏呯矗缂傚倸鍊哥粔鎾晝椤忓牏宓侀柛鎰靛枟閺呮悂鏌ｅΟ鍝勬闁靛ň鏅滈悡銉╂煛閸屾氨浠㈤柍閿嬫閺岋綁鏁冮埀顒勬偋閹炬剚娼栧┑鐘宠壘绾惧吋鎱ㄥΟ鍝勮埞妞ゃ倐鍋撶紓鍌氬€风粈渚€顢栭崱娆愭殰闁跨喓濮撮弸浣衡偓骞垮劚閹峰宕ョ€ｎ喗鐓曢柍鈺佸暞缁€鍫㈢磼閻樺啿鍝烘慨濠冩そ瀹曠兘顢橀悩鑼偧闂佹眹鍩勯崹閬嶃€冩繝鍥╁祦濠㈣埖鍔曟导鐘绘煏婢诡垰鎷戠槐鏌ユ⒑閸濆嫷妲搁柣妤€瀚板畷婵堜沪閻偄缍婇、姘跺焵椤掑嫬钃熼柣鏃傗拡閺佸﹪鎮峰▎蹇擃仾闁绘繃宀稿铏规嫚閳ヨ櫕鐏嶇紓渚囧枛閻線鎮橀幒妤佲拺缂備焦蓱鐏忣參鎮楀☉鎺撴珚闁哄被鍔戦、姗€鎮㈤搹鍦闂備焦鐪归崹钘夅缚瑜斿畷婊冪暦閸モ晝锛滈梺鑹板閸╂牠藟婢舵劖鍋傞柕鍫濐槹閻撳繘鏌涢锝囩婵℃彃缍婇弻锟犲川椤斿墽鐣洪梺闈涙搐鐎氼垳绮诲☉銏犵闁哄鍨堕鐔虹磽閸屾瑦绁版い鏇嗗吘娑樷攽鐎ｎ亣鎽曞┑鐐村灟閸╁嫰寮崘顔界叆婵犻潧妫欓ˉ鐘炽亜閿斿搫鍔氶柍瑙勫灴閺佸秹宕熼锛勯挼缂傚倷绶￠崰妤呮偡閳轰緡鍤曢悹鍥ㄧゴ濡插牓鏌曡箛鏇炐ラ柣銈傚亾闂傚倷绶氬ḿ褔銈悽鍛娾挃闁告洦鍨遍崑鐔兼煛閸ャ儱鐏柍閿嬪灴閺屾稑鈹戦崱妤婁痪濡炪們鍎查悷鈺呭蓟濞戞鏃堝焵椤掑嫬鐤柛褎顨愮紞鏍叓閸ャ劍绀堢痪鎯у悑娣囧﹪顢涘┑鎰濡炪倕瀛╅幑鍥ь潖濞差亜宸濆┑鐘插濡插牓姊洪幐搴㈢８闁稿酣娼ч悾鐑藉即閵忕姷顔掔紓鍌欑劍鑿ら柟閿嬫そ閹嘲饪伴崨顓ф毉闁汇埄鍨遍〃濠傤嚕椤愶附鐒肩€广儱妫涢崢閬嶆⒑闂堟胆褰掑磿閼碱剚瀚婚柍鈺佸暕缁诲棝鏌涘▎蹇ｆЦ濠殿喖绉归弻鐔碱敊閻ｅ本鍣梺閫炲苯澧紒瀣浮閺佸顪冮妶鍛劉闁圭懓娲ら～蹇撁洪鍕獩婵犵數濮撮崯顐ゅ枈瀹ュ鍊垫繛鍫濈仢閺嬫稑顭胯濞村嘲危閹扮増鍊烽悗娑櫭崝鍛存⒑闂堟稈搴烽柤闈涚秺楠炲繐煤椤忓應鎷洪柣鐘叉礌閳ь剙纾埀顒€顭烽弻娑樷槈閸楃偟浼囬梺鍝ュ枎閻楀﹥绌辨繝鍥ㄥ€锋い蹇撳閸嬫捇濡舵径濠勶紱闂佸憡娲﹂崹渚€宕堕澶嬫櫖闂佺粯鍔栧ḿ娆愮婵傚憡鈷掑ù锝呮憸娴犮垺銇勯幋婵囧櫧婵炲棎鍨介幃娆撴倻濡厧骞嶉梻鍌欑贰閸欏繒绮婚幋锔惧祦婵せ鍋撻柡灞剧☉椤粓宕遍弴鐘插毈缂傚倷鑳剁划顖滄崲閸儱绠栧ù鐘差儐椤ュ牊绻涢幋鐑嗘畼闁硅娲熷缁樻媴缁涘娈紓浣虹帛閸ㄥ綊骞戦姀銈呴唶婵犻潧鐗婂▓鎯р攽閻樼粯娑ф俊顐㈢焸瀹曞ジ顢旈崼鐔哄幈濡炪倖鍔戦崐鏇㈠几閺冨牊鐓曟俊顖涘椤ュ鏌嶇憴鍕伌闁诡喒鏅濈槐鎺懳熸繝姘殬闂備浇顕х€涒晠宕欒ぐ鎺戠闁绘梻鍘х粻鏍ㄦ叏濡炶浜鹃悗瑙勬穿缁叉儳顕ラ崟顓涘亾閿濆簼绨诲ù鐓庨閳规垿鎮╅崹顐ｆ瘎婵犳鍠楅幐鍐茬暦椤栫儐鏁嶉柣鎰棘閿旂晫绡€闂傚牊渚楅崕鎰版煟閹惧鎳勯柕鍥у瀵噣鍩€椤掑嫬纾块柟鎯版閸屻劑鎮楅悽鐢点€婇柛瀣尭閳绘捇宕归鐣屼邯闂備胶绮悧鏇㈠Χ閹间焦鍋樻い鏇楀亾妤犵偛娲、姗€鎮㈠畡鏉课ゅ┑锛勫亼閸婃牠寮婚妸鈺佽Е閻庯綆鍠栧Ч鏌ョ叓閸ャ劎鈯曢柍閿嬪浮閺屾稓浠﹂幑鎰棟闂侀€炲苯澧伴柛蹇旓耿楠炲﹤螖閸涱參鍞堕梺鍝勬川閸嬬喖鎮块崶顒佲拺閻熸瑥瀚粈鍐┿亜閺囧棗娲ょ憴锔炬喐閻楀牆绗氶柣鎾寸〒閳ь剙绠嶉崕杈殽閹间胶宓侀柡宥庡亞绾惧ジ鏌ｅ▎灞戒壕闂佹悶鍔岄悥鐓庮嚕婵犳艾惟闁冲搫鍊告禍鐐烘⒑缁嬫寧婀扮紒瀣灴椤㈡棃鏁撻敓锟�:0 | 濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣鎴ｆ閺嬩線鏌涘☉姗堟敾闁告瑥绻橀弻锝夊箣閿濆棭妫勯梺鍝勵儎缁舵岸寮诲☉妯锋婵鐗婇弫楣冩⒑閸涘﹦鎳冪紒缁橈耿瀵鏁愭径濠勵吅闂佹寧绻傚Λ顓炍涢崟顖涒拺闁告繂瀚烽崕搴ｇ磼閼搁潧鍝虹€殿喛顕ч埥澶娢熼柨瀣垫綌婵犳鍠楅〃鍛存偋婵犲洤鏋佸Δ锝呭暞閳锋垿鏌涘☉姗堝姛闁瑰啿鍟扮槐鎺旂磼濮楀牐鈧法鈧鍠栭…鐑藉极閹邦厼绶炲┑鐘插閸氬懏绻濋悽闈浶㈤柣蹇斿哺瀹曟繈寮介銈囶槸濠德板€曢幊蹇涘煕閹达附鈷戞い鎰╁€曟禒婊堟煠濞茶鐏￠柡鍛埣椤㈡岸鍩€椤掑嫬钃熸繛鎴炵懅缁♀偓闂佺ǹ鏈粙鎴炵閺夋嚦鏃堟偐闂堟稐娌梺鍛婃⒐閻楁粓骞戦姀鐘斀閻庯綆浜為ˇ銊ヮ渻閵堝懐绠版俊顐ｎ殕椤ㄣ儵宕熼娑掓嫽婵炶揪绲挎灙闁哄棝浜堕弻鐔哄枈閸楃偘鍠婂銈冨灪閻楃姴鐣烽崼鏇炵厸闁告劦浜為崢鐘充繆閻愵亜鈧牕螞閸愵喖鏋佹い鏇楀亾鐎规洘鍨块獮姗€鎳滈棃娑欑€梻浣告啞濞诧箓宕滃☉銏℃櫖婵せ鍋撴慨濠冩そ瀹曘劍绻濋崘锝嗗闂備焦鎮堕崝搴ㄥ极婵犳哎鈧礁顫濋懜鍨珳婵犮垼娉涢敃顏堝船閸洘鈷戦柛婵嗗瀹告繈鏌涚€ｎ剙鏋涙い銏∶叅妞ゅ繐鎳夐幏铏圭磽閸屾瑧鍔嶅畝锝呮健楠炲﹪宕橀鐣屽幍闂佹儳娴氶崑鍕叏瀹ュ鐓熸繛鎴濆船濞呭秴鈹戦鐟颁壕闂備線娼ч悧鍡椢涘畝鍕濠电姵纰嶉埛鎴犵磼鐎ｎ偄顕滄繝鈧导瀛樼厽闁绘洖鍊搁々顒傜磼椤旂》韬柟顔ㄥ洤閱囨繛鎴烆殘閻╁孩淇婇悙顏勨偓鏍礉閹达箑鏄ラ柛鏇ㄥ€犻敐澶婄濞达絽婀遍崢浠嬫⒑閹稿海绠撻柟鍐查鍗卞┑鐘崇閹虫岸鏌ㄥ┑鍡╂Ч闁稿濮电换娑㈠箣閻愯尙鐟ㄦ繝鈷€鍕弨闁哄矉缍€缁犳盯骞橀搹顐ｎ唲闂備礁鐤囬～澶愬垂閸ф绠栨繛鍡樻尭缁狙囨煙鐎电ǹ小婵℃鎸剧槐鎾存媴閸濆嫪澹曞┑鐘灪宀ｈ法鍒掗弮鍥ヤ汗闁瑰搫顑傞崑鎾寸瑹閳ь剙顕ｉ幘顔藉亜濞撴凹鍨辩粊顐︽⒑鐠囨彃鍤辩紓宥呮瀹曟垿宕卞☉妯哄亶濡炪倕绻愰悧濠囧煕閹达附鐓曢柟鐐綑缁茶霉濠婂嫮绠樼紒杈ㄥ笧閹风娀骞撻幒鎾搭啋闁诲氦顫夊ú锕傚垂閸洜宓侀柟鐑樺殾閺冣偓閹峰懘宕崟顐ゎ唶闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞夐敓鐘茬闁硅揪绠戠粈澶愬箹濞ｎ剙鐏繛鍛У缁绘盯骞嬪▎蹇曚痪闂佺粯鎸婚惄顖炲蓟濞戞ǚ妲堥柛妤冨仦閻忔捇姊洪崨濠勬喛闁稿鎹囧缁樻媴閸涘﹥鍎撻梺鍝勭墱閸撴稓鍒掑▎鎾崇闁挎洍鍋撻柣鎾偓鎰佺唵闁兼悂娼ф慨鍥╃棯椤撴稑浜鹃梻鍌欒兌缁垶宕濆Ο闂寸剨婵炲棙鎼╅弫濠囨煙鐎电ǹ浠х紒鈾€鍋撻梻浣圭湽閸ㄨ棄岣胯缁傛帒饪伴崼鐔哄幗濠德板€愰崑鎾绘煥閺囥劋閭鐐插暣閺佹捇鎮╅懠顑跨礈闂備礁缍婇。锕傛倿閿斿墽绀婇幖娣妽閳锋垿鏌熼鍡楁噽椤斿洤鈹戦悩顐壕闂備緡鍓欑粔鐢稿磿濡や胶绠鹃柛鈩兠慨澶岀磼閻樿崵鐣洪柡灞剧洴閸╁嫰宕楅悪鈧禍顏勭暦濠靛围濠㈣泛顑囬崢閬嶆⒑鐟欏嫬鍔ら柣掳鍔庡▎銏ゅ矗婢跺牅绨诲銈呯箰鐎氼剟寮抽敐鍛斀闁炽儱纾崺锝団偓瑙勬礀瀹曨剝鐏冮梺鍛婂壃閸曨兘鏋欏┑鐘殿暜缁辨洟宕戦幋锕€纾圭憸蹇曞垝婵犳艾绠荤紓鍫濇噽缁变即鎮峰⿰鍕棃闁靛棔绀侀～婵嬫嚋閸偅鐝抽梻浣虹《閸撴繈鎮疯閹線宕煎┑鍐╂杸濡炪倖姊归弸缁樼瑹濞戙垺鐓曟俊顖涘椤ュ鏌嶇拠鑼㈡顏冨嵆瀹曞ジ鎮㈤崣澶婎伖闂傚倷绀侀幉锛勭矙閹达附鏅濋柨鏇炲€搁悡鈥愁熆閼搁潧濮堥柣鎾存礀閳规垿鎮╅幓鎺嶇敖闂佺粯鎹侀崑鎰板焵椤掑喚娼愭繛鍙夌矋閺呰泛螖閸涱厾鐣鹃梺鍝勫暙閻楀棙鍎梻渚€娼ч敍蹇涘礃閵娧屽敽闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曞箠閹捐瑙﹂悗锝庡枟閸嬧晜銇勮箛鎾跺缂佲偓婢跺备鍋撻崗澶婁壕闂侀€炲苯澧伴柛鎺撳笧閹风姴顔忛钘夊厞闂佸搫顦悧鍕礉瀹€鍕嚑闁硅揪闄勯悡娆撴煕韫囨挸鎮戦柛搴㈩殜閺岋綁骞樺畷鍥р叺閻庢鍣崑鍛崲濠靛鐐婇柕濞у啫绠為梻鍌欑閹碱偄煤閵忋倕绀夌€光偓閸曨剙鈧爼鏌ㄩ悢鍝勑ｉ柣鎾跺枛閺岀喖骞嗚閸ょ喖鏌嶉挊澶樻Ч闁靛洤瀚伴、姗€鍩勯崘顏傗偓濠囨⒑閸︻厽鍤€閻庢矮鍗抽獮鍐ㄢ堪閸愮偓寤洪梺绯曞墲閿曨偆妲愰幒鎴旀斀闁绘ê鐏氶弳鈺呮煕鐎ｎ偆娲存鐐诧攻閹棃鍩堥妷锔锯槈闁宠棄顦～婵嬵敇瑜庣紞妤呮⒒娴ｅ憡璐￠柛搴涘€曢～蹇涘捶椤撴稑浜炬慨姗嗗幖閸濇椽鏌＄仦璇测偓妤呭窗婵犲洤纭€闁绘劕妯婂ḿ缁樹繆閻愵亜鈧呭緤娴犲绠规い鎰惰吂閳ь剚妫冨畷姗€顢欓崲澹洤绠圭紒顔煎帨閸嬫捇鎳犻鍌涙櫒缂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸撲礁鍨濇い鏍仦閺呮繈鏌曡箛瀣偓妤€鐣垫笟鈧弻鈥愁吋鎼粹€崇闂佸湱顢婇崺鏍Φ閸曨垰绠婚悹铏瑰劋閻庡姊洪崫鍕靛剰闁稿﹤鐏濋～蹇撁洪鍕獩婵犵數濮撮崯顐λ囬埡鍛拺缂佸顑欓崕蹇斾繆椤愶絿绠炵€殿噮鍋勯濂稿醇閵忋垺婢戞繝鐢靛仦閸ㄥ爼鎮烽姀銈呯缂備焦岣跨粻楣冩煙閻愵剚缍戦柣鎺戠秺閺屾稓鈧綆鍋呯亸鎵磼缂佹ḿ鈯曢柟宄版嚇瀹曟﹢骞撻幒婵呯磻濠电偛顕慨闈涚暆缁嬫娼栫紓浣股戞刊鎾煕濞戙垺娑ф繝鈧柆宥呯劦妞ゆ帊鑳堕埢鎾绘煛閸涱垰鈻堟鐐插暣閺佹捇鎮╅搹顐ｎ仧闂備胶绮灙閻忓繑鐟╅幃鎯洪鍛嫼濠殿喚鎳撳ú銈夋倶椤曗偓瀵悂顢旈崨顐＄盎濡炪倖鍔戦崹娲吹閸ヮ剚鐓涢悘鐐靛亾缁€瀣偓瑙勬礈閸樠囧煘閹达箑鐐婇柤鍛婎問濡捇姊婚崒娆戭槮缂傚秴锕銊╁础閻戝棙瀵岄梺鑺ッˇ钘夅缚閺嶃劎绠剧€瑰壊鍠曠花濂告煕閵堝棗娴柡灞炬礋瀹曠厧鈹戦崶褎顏￠梻浣筋嚙鐎涒晠宕曢幎钘夌厴闁硅揪闄勯崑鎰亜閺冨洤浜瑰ù鐘荤畺濮婃椽骞愭惔鈥虫懙闂佸搫鑻粔鍓佹閹烘嚦鐔烘嫚閼碱剨绱﹂梻鍌欒兌绾爼寮查鍡樺床婵犻潧妫涢弳锕傛煏婵炵偓娅撻柡浣革躬閺岀喖顢涢崱妤€鏆熸い鎾炽偢濮婂宕掑顑藉亾妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘ｅ亾妤犵偛顦甸弫鎾绘偐閹绘帞鈧厼顪冮妶鍡欏⒈闁稿绋撴竟鏇°亹閹烘挾鍘搁悗骞垮劚妤犲憡绂嶉幇鐗堢厱閻庯綆鍋呯亸顓熴亜椤愶絿绠為柟顔界懇椤㈡鍩€椤掑嫷鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹 | 濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣鎴ｆ閺嬩線鏌涘☉姗堟敾闁告瑥绻橀弻锝夊箣閿濆棭妫勯梺鍝勵儎缁舵岸寮诲☉妯锋婵鐗婇弫楣冩⒑閸涘﹦鎳冪紒缁橈耿瀵鏁愭径濠勵吅闂佹寧绻傚Λ顓炍涢崟顖涒拺闁告繂瀚烽崕搴ｇ磼閼搁潧鍝虹€殿喛顕ч埥澶娢熼柨瀣垫綌婵犳鍠楅〃鍛存偋婵犲洤鏋佸Δ锝呭暞閳锋垿鏌涘☉姗堝姛闁瑰啿鍟扮槐鎺旂磼濮楀牐鈧法鈧鍠栭…鐑藉极閹邦厼绶炲┑鐘插閸氬懘姊绘担鐟邦嚋缂佽鍊歌灋妞ゆ挾鍊ｅ☉銏犵妞ゆ牗绋堥幏娲⒑閸涘﹦绠撻悗姘卞厴瀹曟洘鎯旈敐鍥╋紲闂佸吋鎮傚ḿ褔宕搹鍏夊亾濞堝灝鏋涙い顓犲厴楠炲啴濮€閵堝懐顦ч柣蹇撶箲閻楁鈧矮绮欏铏规嫚閺屻儱寮板┑鐐板尃閸曨厾褰炬繝鐢靛Т娴硷綁鏁愭径妯绘櫓闂佸憡鎸嗛崪鍐簥闂傚倷鑳剁划顖炲礉閿曞倸绀堟繛鍡樻尭缁€澶愭煏閸繃顥撳ù婊勭矋閵囧嫰骞樼捄鐩掋垽鏌涘Ο渚殶闁逞屽墯椤旀牠宕伴弽顓涒偓锕傛倻閽樺鐎梺褰掑亰閸樿偐娆㈤悙娴嬫斀闁绘ɑ褰冮顐︽煛婢跺﹥鍟炲ǎ鍥э躬閹瑩顢旈崟銊ヤ壕闁哄稁鍋呴弳婊冣攽閻樺弶澶勯柛濠傛健閺屻劑寮撮悙娴嬪亾閸濄儱顥氶柛褎顨嗛悡娆撴煕閹炬鎳庣粭锟犳⒑閹惰姤鏁遍柛銊ユ健瀵鎮㈤崗鐓庢異闂佸疇妗ㄥ鎺斿垝閼哥數绡€缁剧増菤閸嬫捇鎮欓挊澶夊垝闂備礁鎼張顒傜矙閹烘梹宕叉繝闈涱儏绾惧吋绻涢幋鐏荤厧菐椤曗偓閺岋絾鎯旈姀鈺佹櫛闂佸摜濮甸惄顖炪€佸鎰佹▌闂佺硶鏂傞崕鎻掝嚗閸曨垰绠涙い鎺戭槹缂嶅倿姊绘担绋挎毐闁圭⒈鍋婂畷鎰版偡閹佃櫕鐎洪梺鎼炲労閸撴岸鍩涢幒鎳ㄥ綊鏁愰崶銊ユ畬濡炪倖娲樼划搴ｆ閹烘梹瀚氶柟缁樺坊閸嬫挸顫㈠畝鈧禍杈ㄧ節閻㈤潧浠﹂柛銊у枛楠炲﹪鎮欓崫鍕€炲銈嗗坊閸嬫捇宕鐐村仭婵犲﹤鍟扮粻鍐差熆鐟欏嫭绀嬮柟绋匡攻缁旂喎鈹戦崱娆懶ㄩ梺杞扮劍閸旀瑥鐣烽妸鈺婃晩闁芥ê顦竟宥夋⒑鐠囪尙绠扮紒缁樺姉閹广垹螣娓氼垱缍庡┑鐐叉▕娴滄粌顔忓┑鍡忔斀闁绘ɑ褰冮銏ゆ煟閿濆鏁辩紒缁樼箞閹粙妫冨☉妤冩崟闂備焦瀵уú蹇涘磹濠靛鈧礁顫濋懜鍨珳闂佺硶鍓濋悷褔鎯侀崼婵冩斀妞ゆ梹鏋绘笟娑㈡煕濡搫鎮戠紒鍌氱Т楗即宕奸悢鍙夊缂傚倷绀侀鍫濃枖閺囩姷涓嶅ù鐓庣摠閻撶喖鏌曟繛褍鍟獮瀣旈悩闈涗粶缂佺粯鍨归幑銏犫攽閸♀晜鍍靛銈嗘尵婵挳鐛Δ鍛拺缁绢厼鎳庨ˉ宥夋煙濞茶绨界€垫澘锕ラ妶锝夊礃閵婏箒绶㈤梻浣稿暱閹碱偊骞婃惔銊ョ闁绘ḿ鍋ㄦ禍婊堢叓閸ャ劍灏い蹇嬪€濋弻锟犲焵椤掍胶顩烽悗锝庡亞閸樻捇姊洪棃娑辨Ф闁告柨鐭傞幆鍐洪鍛幗濡炪倖鎸鹃崰鎾诲箠閸曨垱鐓欏〒姘仢婵＄晫绱掔紒妯肩疄鐎规洘锕㈤崺鐐村緞濮濆本顎楅梻浣筋嚙濮橈箓锝炴径濞掓椽鏁冮崒姘憋紱婵犵數濮撮崐濠氬汲閿曞倹鐓熼柡鍐ㄥ€甸幏锟犳煛娴ｅ憡顥㈤柡灞界Х椤т線鏌涢幘瀵告噰闁糕斂鍨归鍏煎緞婵炩拃鍥ㄧ厱闁靛鍨哄▍鍥煥濞戞瑧绠栫紒缁樼⊕濞煎繘宕滆閸嬔囨⒑閻戔晛澧叉俊顐㈠暙閻ｇ兘妫冨☉鎺撶€婚梺瑙勫劤椤曨參宕㈤挊澶嗘斀閹烘娊宕愰幘缁樺€块柨鏂垮綖閻掑﹥銇勯幘璺烘瀭濞存粍绮撻弻锟犲炊閺堢數鏁栫紓浣割儓瀹曠數妲愰幒鏃傜＜婵☆垵鍋愰悾闈涱渻閵堝骸浜濈紒璇茬墦閵嗕線寮介鐐靛幋闂佺粯鍔﹂崜姘舵偟濮樿埖鈷戦柛婵嗗濠€鐗堢箾閸欏顏堫敋閵夆晛绀嬫い鏍ㄥ哺閸炶泛鈹戦悩缁樻锭闁绘鎳橀幆鈧い蹇撶墛閳锋帒霉閿濆懏鍟為柟顖氱墦閺屾稒绻濋崟顒佹瘓閻庤娲橀崹鍧楃嵁濡偐纾兼俊顖炴敱鐎氫粙姊绘担鍛靛綊寮甸鍕仭闁靛ň鏅涚粈鍌溾偓鍏夊亾闁逞屽墴閹偓妞ゅ繐鐗滈弫鍥煟閹扮増娑ч柣鎾跺枛閹鎲撮崟顒傤槰缂備緡鍠栭惌鍌炲春閻愬搫绠ｉ柣姗嗗亜娴滈箖鏌ㄥ┑鍡涱€楀ù婊勭箖缁绘盯宕ㄩ瑙ｆ嫽缂備浇椴搁幑鍥х暦閹烘埈娼╂い鎴ｆ娴滈箖鏌ｉ幋锝呅撻柛濠傛健閺屻劑寮撮悙娴嬪亾閸濄儳鐭嗗鑸靛姈閻撴稓鈧箍鍎辨鎼佺嵁濡ゅ懏鐓曢幖绮光偓鎰佸妷闂侀潧娲ょ€氭澘顕ｆ禒瀣╅柕澶堝劜閻︽挻绻濋悽闈涗粶闁告艾顑夐幃褍螖閸愨晛搴婂┑鐐村灦閿曗晠宕崨顔轰簻闁哄啫娲ら崥褰掓煟閳轰線鍙勯柟顔筋殜閹兘鎮ч崼婵囨畼缂傚倷娴囬褔宕愰崸妤€鏄ラ柣鎰惈缁狅綁鏌ㄩ弮鍥棄濞存粌缍婂娲捶椤撶姴绗￠柣銏╁灙閺呯姴鐣峰┑鍥х窞闁归偊鍘搁幏鐑樼箾閺夋垵鎮戦柣鐔濆洤绠栧┑鍌氭啞閻撴洟鐓崶銊︻棖闁肩増瀵ч〃銉╂倷閹绘帗娈柧缁樼墵閺屾稑鈽夐崡鐐茬濡炪伅浣稿缁♀偓闂侀潧楠忕徊鍓ф兜妤ｅ啯鐓ラ柡鍥朵簽缁嬭崵绱掗弮鍌氭灈鐎殿喗鎸虫慨鈧柍閿亾闁归绮换娑欐綇閸撗冨煂闂佺濮ょ划搴ｅ垝閺冨牊鍊绘俊顖氭贡缁犳艾顪冮妶鍡楀闁稿氦灏欏☉鐢稿礈娴ｈ櫣锛滃銈嗘閸嬫劖鏅跺☉銏＄厵鐎瑰嫮澧楅崵鍥煙閻撳海绉洪柡灞芥噹閳藉顫濇潏銊ユ灀闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炴牠顢曢妶鍥╃厠闂佸搫琚崕杈╃矆婢舵劖鍊甸柨婵嗛婢ь垳鈧娲橀悡锟犲蓟濞戙垹鐒洪柛鎰典簴婵洭姊虹紒妯诲碍缂佺粯锕㈠璇测槈閵忊晜鏅濋梺鎸庣箓濞层劑鎮鹃悽鍛娾拺闂侇偆鍋涢懟顖涙櫠椤曗偓閺岀喓鎷犺绾捐法绱掗纰卞剰妞ゆ挸銈稿畷閬嶅箛椤戣法鍑归梻鍌欑閹诧繝宕濊箛娑樻濞撴埃鍋撴鐐茬箰鐓ゆい蹇撴噽閸樹粙鏌熼懖鈺勊夐柛鎾寸箘閹峰綊鍨鹃弬銉︽杸濡炪倖姊婚崑鎾诲汲椤掑嫭瀵犻柣鏂款殠閻斿棝鎮规潪鎷岊劅闁稿骸绉撮湁婵犲﹤瀚惌鎺楁煛鐏炶濮傜€殿噮鍣ｅ畷鍓佹崉閻戞﹩鍞查梻鍌欐祰椤曆勵殽韫囨洜涓嶉柟鎹愵嚙閽冪喐绻涢幋娆忕仼闁绘挻锕㈤弻娑⑩€﹂幋婵囩亾婵炲濮烽崢褔鈥旈崘顔嘉ч柛鈩兠喊宥夋⒑闂堟稓澧㈤弸顏堟煟閿濆洤鍘寸€规洩绻濋幃娆忣吋閸パ勭亪闂佺娅曢悧鐘诲春閻愪警鏁勯柟顖嗏偓閸嬫挸鈹戦崱鈺傜稁缂傚倷鐒﹀玻鍧楁偡瑜版帗鐓冪憸婊堝礈濞嗗繒骞撻柤鎰佸灱濡線姊洪棃鈺冨埌缂傚秴锕ら～蹇撁洪鍕獩婵犵數濮抽懗鍓佹崲娓氣偓濮婃椽骞栭悙鎻掝瀴婵犮垻鎳撳Λ婵嗩嚕椤愶富鏁嬮柍褜鍓熼悰顕€骞掑Δ鈧猾宥夋煕鐏炲墽鐜荤紒杈ㄥ▕濮婄粯鎷呴崨闈涚秺瀵敻顢楅崟顒€娈炴俊銈忕到閸燁偊鎮為崹顐犱簻闁圭儤鍨甸瀛樹繆椤愶絽鐏╃紒杈ㄥ浮椤㈡瑩鎳栭埡渚囨澑缂傚倷鐒﹂〃鍫ュ窗閺嶎厼鏄ラ柍褜鍓氶妵鍕箳閸℃ぞ澹曢梻浣风串缁插潡宕楀鈧悰顕€宕堕鈧痪褍顭跨捄鐑樻喐闁绘劕锕缁樼瑹閳ь剙岣胯閺佸秷绠涘☉妯虹獩濡炪倖鐗楅懝楣冩嚇椤栫偞鈷掗柛灞捐壘閳ь剟顥撶划鍫熸媴闂堚晞鈧潡姊洪鈧粔鐢稿箚閻愬搫绠规繛锝庡墮婵¤偐绱掗幇顓ф疁闁哄瞼鍠栭獮鎴﹀箛闂堟稒顔勭紓浣哄亾閸庢娊鈥﹂悜钘夎摕闁绘棁銆€閸嬫挸鈽夊▎瀣窗闁荤姵鍔忛弲婵嬪箟閹间焦鍋嬮柛顐ｇ箘閻熴劎绱撴担鎻掍壕闂佺ǹ鐬奸崑鐐烘偂閺囥垻鍙撻柛銉ｅ姀婢规ê霉濠婂啯璐＄紒杈ㄥ笧閳ь剨缍嗘禍婵嬪窗濡粯鍙忓┑鐘插鐢盯鏌熷畡鐗堝櫧缂侇喗鐟╅幊妤咁敍濮樺崬骞嬫繝鐢靛Х閺佹悂宕戝☉妯滅喐绻濋崶褏鐓戦梺鍛婂姦閻撳牓宕甸弴鐐╂斀闁绘ê纾。鏌ユ煛閸涱喖绲绘い顓℃硶閹瑰嫰鎮€涙ɑ鏆版俊鐐€戦崕鑼崲閸繍娼栨繛宸簻閹硅埖銇勯幘顖氫壕闂侀潻瀵岄崢鎼佸磻閹炬枼妲堥柟鐑樻尰閻濇岸鎮楃憴鍕婵炶尙鍠栭悰顔嘉熼懖鈺冿紲濠碘槅鍨甸妴鈧柛瀣崌瀹曞綊顢曢妶鍥跺晭闂備礁澹婇崑鍛崲閸曨剛顩烽柕蹇嬪€栭悡娑㈡倵閿濆骸澧柡瀣叄閺屽秶鎲撮崟顐や紝闂佽鍠楅悷褔骞忛悩渚Щ婵炴潙鍚嬮崝鏇⑩€旈崘顔嘉ч幖绮光偓鑼泿缂傚倷鑳剁划顖滄暜閻愬弬锝夊箛閺夎法顔婇梺鐟板暱绾绢參宕伴幘璇茬闁绘ê妯婇崯鍛亜閺冨倹鍤€濞存粓绠栭弻鐔煎礈瑜忕敮娑㈡煃闁垮鐏撮柡宀€鍠栭、娑㈠幢濡や礁娅у銈嗘煥閿曨亜顫忛搹瑙勫厹闁告侗鍠氳ぐ褔姊洪崷顓€瑙勬櫠娴犲绀嗛柟鐑橆殢閺佸洭鏌曡箛鏇炐ュù鐓庮儔濮婃椽宕崟顐熷亾閸洖纾块柡灞诲劚濡﹢鏌嶈閸撶喎顫忕紒妯诲闁惧繒鎳撶粭锟犳⒑閸涘﹥鈷愰柣妤冨仱婵＄敻骞囬弶璺槰濡炪倕绻愬Λ娆撴晬韫囨稒鍋℃繝濠傚椤ュ牏鈧鍠栭…鐑藉极閹版澘宸濋柛灞剧⊕椤ュ牏鈧娲橀敃銏′繆閹间礁绠涢柍杞拌兌娴煎牓姊洪崫鍕効缂傚秳绶氬顐﹀箛閺夎法鍊為悷婊冪Ч閻涱喚鈧綆鈧厽妫冮幃鈺呮濞戞鎹曟繝鐢靛仜濡﹪宕㈡總鍓叉晪闁挎繂顦柋鍥煛閸モ晛浠фい鏂挎喘閺岀喖鎳濋悧鍫濇锭缂備浇椴稿ú鐔镐繆閸撲焦宕夐悶娑掑墲閺傗偓闂備焦瀵х粙鎴犫偓姘煎墯缁傚秵绺介崨濠勫幈婵犵數濮撮崯鐗堟櫠閸偒娈介柣鎰綑婵秹鏌熺粵鍦瘈濠碘€崇埣瀹曞爼鍩￠崘銊ョ畾闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曞箠閹炬椿鏁嬫い鎾卞灩绾惧鏌ｉ弮鍌ゅ劆闁逞屽墮閹虫ê顕ｆ繝姘ㄩ柨鏃€鍎抽獮妤呮⒒娓氣偓閳ь剚绋戝畵鍡樼箾娴ｅ啿瀚▍鐘炽亜閺嶎偄浠﹂柣鎾存礃缁绘盯宕卞Δ鍐唺缂備胶濮佃ぐ鍐絹闂佹悶鍎滃鍫濇儓婵＄偑鍊戦崹铏圭矙閹达负鍋戝ù鍏兼綑缁€鍐煏婵炲灝鈧鏁☉娆戠瘈闁汇垽娼ф禒婊堟煟鎺抽崝搴ㄥ礆閹烘绠婚柛鎾叉缁楀姊洪崫鍕枆闁告ǹ鍋愮划濠氬冀閵娿倗绠氶梺闈涚墕閸婂憡绂嶉幆褜娓婚柕鍫濋娴滄繄绱掔拠鑼ⅵ妤犵偛鍟埢搴ㄥ箼閸愨晜娅岄梻渚€鈧偛鑻晶瀛樸亜閵忊剝顥堥柡浣规崌閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� | 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閻愵剙鍔ょ紓宥咃躬瀵鎮㈤崗灏栨嫽闁诲酣娼ф竟濠偽ｉ鍓х＜闁绘劦鍓欓崝銈囩磽瀹ュ拑韬€殿喖顭烽幃銏ゅ礂鐏忔牗瀚介梺璇查叄濞佳勭珶婵犲伣锝夘敊閸撗咃紲闂佺粯鍔﹂崜娆撳礉閵堝棛绡€闁逞屽墴閺屽棗顓奸崨顖氬Е婵＄偑鍊栫敮鎺楀磹瑜版帒鍚归柍褜鍓熼弻锝嗘償閵忕姴姣堥梺鍛婄懃閸燁偊鎮惧畡鎵殾闁搞儜灞绢棥闂佽鍑界徊濠氬礉鐎ｎ€兾旈崨顔规嫼闂侀潻瀵岄崢濂稿礉鐎ｎ喗鐓曢柕濞垮劤缁夎櫣鈧娲橀崝娆撳箖濞嗘挻鍊绘俊顖濇〃閻㈢粯绻濋悽闈浶㈤柨鏇樺€濆畷顖炲箥椤斿彞绗夐梺鐓庮潟閸婃劙宕戦幘鏂ユ灁闁割煈鍠楅悘宥嗙節閻㈤潧浠滈柨鏇ㄤ簻椤曪綁顢曢敃鈧粈鍐┿亜閺冨洤浜归柨娑欑矊閳规垿鎮欓弶鎴犱桓闂佺厧缍婄粻鏍偘椤曗偓瀹曞ジ鎮㈤崜浣虹暰闂備胶绮崝锔界濠婂牆鐒垫い鎴炲劤閳ь剚绻傞悾鐑藉閿涘嫷娴勯柣搴秵娴滄粓鎮楅銏♀拺闁告捁灏欓崢娑㈡煕鐎ｎ亝顥㈤柕鍡楁嚇瀹曪絾寰勫畝鈧惁鍫ユ⒒閸屾氨澧涘〒姘殜瀹曟洟骞囬悧鍫㈠幗闂佽鍎抽悺銊х矆閸愵亞纾肩紓浣贯缚濞插鈧娲栧畷顒冪亙闂佸憡鍔︽禍鍫曞船閾忓湱纾介柛灞剧懆閸忓苯鈹戦鑺ュ唉闁炽儻绠撻幃婊堟寠婢跺孩鎲伴梻浣哄仺閸庤京澹曢銏犳辈闁糕剝绋掗悡鍐喐濠婂牆绀堥柣鏃堫棑閺嗭箑霉閸忓吋缍戠紒鐘差煼閺屻倝宕ㄦ繝搴℃櫛濠电偠鍋愰崰鏍ь潖濞差亜鎹舵い鎾跺仜婵″搫顪冮妶鍐ㄥ闁硅櫕锕㈤弫鎰版倷閸濆嫬绐涢柣搴㈢⊕宀ｅ潡宕㈤挊澶嗘斀闁宠棄妫楅悘銉︾箾閸滃啰绉柡浣哥Т椤撳ジ宕ラ妶鍥ㄥ殌妤楊亞澧楅幆鏂库攽閸喐娅︾紓鍌氬€峰ù鍥ㄣ仈閹间礁绠查柛銉戝懏娈鹃梺鍦劋閸ㄧ喖寮告惔銊︾厵闁绘垶锚閻忋儵鎮介锝呯仩闁宠鍨块幃鈺呭箛娴ｅ憡娅涢梻渚€娼荤紞鍥╁緤鐠恒劌鍨濆┑鐘宠壘閸愨偓濡炪倖鎸鹃崰鎰枍濠婂牊鈷戠紓浣姑慨鍫熺箾閸忚偐鎳呮繛鍡愬灲閹瑩鎮滃Ο鐓庡箥闂傚倷绶￠崣蹇曠不閹达箑绀夐柨鏇炲€归悡銉╂煛閸モ晛浠滈柍褜鍓欑紞濠囧箖閿熺姴鍗抽柕蹇ョ磿閸樻悂姊洪幖鐐插姌闁稿氦椴告穱濠冪附閸涘﹦鍘介棅顐㈡处濞叉牕鏆╃紓鍌欐祰妞村摜鏁敓鐘茬畺闁宠桨鑳堕弳锕傛煕閵夛絽濡奸柛銊╀憾濮婄粯鎷呴崨濠冨創闂佸搫鐗滈崜鐔煎箚閸曨垼鏁嶉柣鎰典簴閸嬫挻绗熼埀顒€顕ｉ幘顔碱潊闁斥晛鍟悵鎶芥⒒娴ｈ櫣銆婇柛鎾寸箞閹兘顢涘В纭风秮閹囧醇濠婂懐鐣鹃梻浣虹帛閸旓附绂嶅⿰鍫濈劦妞ゆ帊鐒︾粈鍐┿亜閵婏絽鍔︾€规洦鍋婃俊鐤槾闁绘挸顑夊娲嚒閵堝懏鐏堥梺绋款儏閿曘倕鐜婚崸妤€鍐€妞ゆ挾鍠撻崣鍕椤愩垺澶勯柟姝屽吹閹峰綊鏁撻悩宕囧幗濡炪倖鎸鹃崰鎾诲箠閸曨厾纾肩紓浣贯缚濞插鈧娲栧畷顒冪亽闂佸憡绻傜€氼剝顣介梻鍌氬€风粈渚€骞夐敓鐘茬濡わ絽鍟壕濠氭煙閹规劕鐓愮€规洖寮剁换娑㈠箣閻愯尙鍔伴梺绋款儐閹告悂鍩ユ径濞炬瀻閻庯綆鍓涚粣妤呮⒒娴ｈ銇熼柛妯虹秺瀹曟劙寮撮姀锛勭暢濠电姷鏁告慨鎾晝閵堝洩濮抽柤娴嬫櫈婵磭绱撴担楠ㄦ粍绂嶅⿰鍫熺厸闁搞儲婀圭花浠嬫煙椤旂鍋㈤柡宀€鍠愰ˇ鐗堟償閳辨帇鍨藉Λ浣瑰緞閹邦厼鈧敻鏌ㄥ┑鍡涱€楀ù婊嗗Г缁绘盯宕楅崗纰辨濠殿喖锕︾划顖滅箔閻旂厧鐒垫い鎺嗗亾瀹€锝堝劵椤︽挳鏌熼獮鍨伈妤犵偞甯￠獮姗€寮堕幋婵呯礋闂傚倷绀佹竟濠囧磻娓氣偓瀹曟洘娼忛妸銉ュ闂傚倸鍊烽悞锔锯偓绗涘吘娑欐媴閸撳弶绂嗛梺闈浤涢崱妞モ剝绻濋悽闈浶ｇ痪鏉跨Ч閸╂盯骞嬮敂鐣屽幈濠电娀娼уΛ妤咁敂閳哄懏鐓冪憸婊堝礈濮樿泛绠栭柛宀€鍋涚粻鏍ㄤ繆椤栨縿鈧偓闁衡偓娴犲鐓曟い鎰Т閻忣喗銇勯敂璇茬仸婵﹥妞藉畷顐﹀礋椤撳濞€閺屾盯寮捄銊愌呪偓瑙勬穿缂嶁偓缂佺姵绋戦埥澶娾枎韫囧海鏁惧┑鐘垫暩閸嬫稑螞濡ゅ啯宕查柟浼村亰閺佸倿鎮楀☉娆嬬細缂佺娀绠栭弻娑㈩敃閵堝懏鐏侀梺娲诲幗鐢繝寮婚垾宕囨殕闁逞屽墴瀹曚即寮介婧惧亾娴ｇ硶鏋庨柟鐐綑娴滄鏌熼懖鈺勊夐柟绛圭秮閸┾剝鎷呴崟顒佺叆閾绘牕鈹戦悩杈厡闁艰櫕妞藉娲川婵犲孩鐣堕梺鍝ュ枎濞硷繝骞冩ィ鍐╁€婚柦妯猴級閳哄懏鐓冮柛婵嗗閺€濠氭煛閸滃啰绉柟顔煎槻楗即宕橀鍛亾濡ゅ啯鍋栨繛鍡楁禋閻斿棝鏌ら幖浣规锭濠殿喖鐗撻弻宥夋煥鐎ｎ亞浠搁梺閫涚┒閸旀垿骞冮悜鑺ュ亱闁割偆鍠愰崐鐑芥⒒娴ｈ櫣甯涢悽顖涱殔椤啯绂掔€ｎ亣鎽曞┑鐐村灟閸ㄨ鍎梻浣哥枃閵嗏偓闁稿鎹囬弻鐔煎蓟閵壯呮毇闂佸搫鏈ú鐔风暦閸楃倣鏃堝焵椤掑嫬姹查柣鎰暩绾捐偐绱撴担璐細缂佺姷鍋熼埀顒冾潐濞叉ḿ鏁埄鍐х箚闁割偅娲栧婵囥亜閺囩偞鍣归柟顕呬邯濮婂宕掑顑藉亾妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘ｅ亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈠Χ閸℃ぞ绮℃俊鐐€栭崝褏绮婚幋鐘差棜闁秆勵殔缁狙囨煕椤愶絿顣叉繛鍛搐閳藉骞樺畷鍥喲囨煛瀹€瀣М闁诡喓鍨荤划娆撳箰鎼达絽娴囬梺鑽ゅ枑缁孩鏅跺Δ鍐╂殰婵°倕鎳庨悿楣冩煛鐏炶鍔滈柣鎾存礃缁绘盯骞嬪┑鍡氬煘闂佸搫顑戞俊鍥儉椤忓牜鏁囨繛鎴灻兼竟鏇㈡⒒閸屾艾鈧悂宕愭搴ｇ焼濞撴埃鍋撴鐐差樀閺佹捇鎮╅崘韫敾闂備線娼чˇ顓㈠磿濞嗗繆妲堟俊顖炴敱閺傗偓闂備胶纭跺褔寮插⿰鍛閹兼番鍔嶉埛鎴︽煙椤栧棗鎳愰鍥р攽閻橆偄浜鹃柡澶婄墐閺呮盯藟濮樿埖鐓曢煫鍥ㄧ⊕閿涚喓绱掔拠鍙夘棡闁靛洤瀚板浠嬪Ω瑜忛悾鐢告⒑閸涘﹣浜㈡い顐㈩樀婵＄敻宕熼娑欐珕闂佸憡绻傜€氼剚鎱ㄩ敃鈧埞鎴︻敊绾兘绶村┑鐐叉嫅缁插潡宕氶幒鎴旀瀻闁规儳纾ˇ閬嶆⒑閻愯棄鍔氶柛妯荤墱濡叉劙鏁愰崱娆戠槇闂佹眹鍨藉ḿ褑鈪撮梻浣呵归鍡涘箲閸パ屾綎婵炲樊浜堕弫鍡涙煃瑜滈崜娑氬垝閺冨牆绠绘い鏃囨閳ь剙娼￠弻娑⑩€﹂幋婵呯按婵炲瓨绮嶇划鎾诲蓟閻旂厧浼犻柛鏇ㄥ帨閵夆晜鐓曢煫鍥ㄦ尵閻掓悂鏌＄仦鍓ф创闁诡喓鍨藉畷顐﹀Ψ閵夈儳鍝楅梻鍌欑閹碱偊鎯夋總绋跨獥闁哄诞鍛濠电偛妫欓幐绋挎纯闂備胶纭堕崜婵嬨€冭箛鏂款嚤闁跨噦鎷� |
