学者学术影响力评价指标的优选与学术行为特点的

国内外比较：学术年龄的视角[1]

杜建，张玢*，李阳，唐小利，许培扬

（中国医学科学院医学信息研究所 北京 100005）

【摘要】以中国医学科学院73位从事临床科研的博士生导师为样本，分析不同学术年龄组在各学术影响力指标上的表现差异，并采用方差分析和相关性分析辅助优选指标。得到的优选指标包括发文量、总被引次数、篇均被引次数、h指数、A指数、g指数和累计影响因子，其中与“平均量”相关的篇均被引次数、A指数更适合于评价中国高水平学者的学术表现；而m熵指数不太适合于评价中国学者的国际影响力；中国科研人员的评价应该注意学术年龄这一因素。

【关键词】学术影响力；学者；学术年龄；引证分析

【中图分类号】G350

Optimization of the evaluation indicators of scholars’ research impact and Comparative Analysis between national and international academic behaviors of Researchers: a Perspective of Scientific Age

Du Jian，Zhang Bin，Li Yang，Tang Xiaoli，Xu Peiyang

(Institute of Medical information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005)

Abstract: Taking 73 doctoral supervisors as the sample who devoted on clinical research and now are working in Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, the paper analyzed the difference of research performance on several indicators, and tried to assist in optimizing the evaluation indicators by using the statistical methods of ANOVA and correlation analysis. The optimized evaluation indicators include number of articles, total cited times, cited times per paper, h-index, A-index, g-index, and accumulated impact factor of journals. Average counts related indicators (e.g. cited times per paper and A-index) are more suitable for assessing China's high level of academics (e.g. Academicians). The indicator of m quotient is not suitable for evaluating international impact of Chinese scholars. The evaluation of China’s researchers should pay attention to the factor of scientific age.

Keywords：Research Impact; China’s Scholars; Scientific Age; Citation Analysis