拒稿信：

I regret to inform you that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in AESCTE. The primary concern is the relevance of this work relative to the state-of-the-art. A quick search reveals that vision-based odometry is heavily used on MERs, with far better accuracy than that proposed in this manuscript. In your manuscript, there is no comparison with this state-of-the-art technology for odometry.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Yours sincerely,

可是vision-based odometry 是相对定位，在一张相片内的定位精度是很高，但是相片的绝对位置是不知道的（或者精度很低，超过几公里）。而我的新方法是绝对定位，位置误差低于170m。绝对定位和相对定位如何比较？编辑误解了？