nanhechem的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/nanhechem

博文

关于诺贝尔化学奖Xiaowei Zhuang 与 Eric Betzig 争议的官方回复 精选

已有 30756 次阅读 2014-10-9 07:56 |个人分类:随笔|系统分类:博客资讯

出于疑惑给诺贝尔奖评奖委员会写了一封信,询问为什么Xiaowei Zhuang没有获奖,没想到很快收到回复。答复中解释:


Dear xxxxx, Please, note that the prize motivation for Dr. Betzig has two aspects. One concerns his theory from 1995 and the other his experimental work 2006 (PALM). You may also note the submission date of his paper, for the record.


所以查了一下投稿日期:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/313/5793/1642

Science
Vol. 313 no. 5793 pp. 1642-1645
DOI: 10.1126/science.1127344

Received for publication 13 March 2006.

Accepted for publication 2 August 2006.

----------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v3/n10/full/nmeth929.html

Nature Methods - 3, 793 - 796 (2006)
Published online: 9 August 2006; | doi:10.1038/nmeth929

Received 7 July 2006; Accepted 31 July 2006; Published online: 9 August 2006.


确实是Eric Betzig先投的论文,而且有先前的基础工作在里面,权重不同。即使这样也十分为Xiaowei Zhuang惋惜。





2014年诺贝尔奖
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1311782-834150.html

上一篇:Xiaowei Zhuang and Eric Betzig

14 罗德海 吕鹏辉 黄永义 唐凌峰 戴德昌 李小文 张鹏 汤建 薛宇 王春艳 shenlu nm sunes biofans

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (21 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备14006957 )

GMT+8, 2019-7-20 15:25

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部