卧龙出海(原卧龙之亮)分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/yuhailiang

博文

这是我见到过最恐怖的学术欺骗? 精选

已有 31569 次阅读 2014-6-11 09:50 |系统分类:观点评述

这是我见到过最恐怖的学术欺骗?

喻海良,2014-06-11

昨天晚上,一个朋友到我家告别,他博士毕业回国发展了。祝他一路平安,早日取得好的成绩。看到身边的朋友一个一个回到中国,心里的感受只有我自己知道。有时候,早晨到学校的路上,我自己哼着“我走过了北呀,我来到了南;我看过了东呀,我见到了西;右边是一座山,左边是一条河,那是我的家乡。”这一年来,思乡的情绪越来越多,这是在国内的朋友无法体会的心情和感受。

今天一大早来到学校,查看的第一份邮件,来自学院群发邮件。说是一个值得查看的学术故事。不看不知道,一看吓一跳。

文章是美国ASCE学会期刊编辑部负责人AngelaCochran写的。这是Angela的介绍“I am the Director of Journals for theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers, publisher of 35 technical journals.Prior to that, I was the Production Director at ASCE overseeing all productionaspects of journals, a monthly member magazine, and book products. I wasManaging Editor of Cancer and Cancer Cytopathology at the American CancerSociety and was Production Manager for Journals at ASCE. I am currently thePresident Elect of the Council of Science Editors. My views on ScholarlyKitchen are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.

在她的文章中,给出了一个指控,而指控的对象是来自中国“伪学术机构”。说是有人以她们学会期刊的名义接受稿件。她提供了一封邮件的截图:同样的期刊名称、同样的学术期刊ISSN号码,同样的期刊学术主编,然而,伪造的邮箱地址以及主编签名。Almosteverything about this letter is fake. The ISSN and journal title are real. Theeditor’s name is real; but, the email and his signature are not.

Angela指出这是一家中国学术机构帮助人们想ASCE学会期刊投稿,并承诺在15-20天内给出是否接收的答复。她认为,根据她的推断,作者应该是向这家学术机构缴纳费用的。“It was in Chinese so I had it translated. The memobasically offered a service to help authors get papers into our Journal of Structural Engineering andanother society’s journal on a related topic. The memo instructed authors tosubmit only original papers in English to a specific email address. Thisservice agency, which claimed to have a very longstanding relationship withASCE, would submit the paper on the author’s behalf and would return a decisionletter within 15-20 days.Additionally, if the paper is accepted, the author will receive a copy of thepaper as it appears in the journal. I can only assume that the author paid upfront for thisservice as I cannot fathom any other motivation. The author, likelyembarrassed by being taken advantage of, is no longer responding to queries onthe matter.

Angela同时还给出了很多有意思的事情,值得我们所有人注意:一些期刊伪造影响因子,一些期刊提供IV值等等,都属于欺骗作者的做法。

至于整个故事,请大家自己阅读下面链接:

http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/05/21/identity-theft-of-the-scholarly-kind/

希望国内能够及早整治这种违法“伪学术”机构,让这种丢人丢到国外的现象早日消灭。



学术不端
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-117889-802391.html

上一篇:澳洲博士生毕业为什么不用答辩?
下一篇:今年中国国际会议论文数坠落至第5名

55 许培扬 王涛 刘全慧 梁进 任胜利 袁贤讯 孙友甫 彭友松 刘军胜 应行仁 Editage意得辑 曹聪 夏少波 徐俊峰 张骥 乔中东 李永丹 赵斌 李宇斌 罗德海 肖振亚 梁洪泽 张洋 张云扬 曹建军 李子欣 赵凤光 薛宇 杨金波 张永祥 佟冬 刁空非 徐耀 郭淼 lbjman Majorite ljxm dachong99 qzw dreamworld zzjtcm zhouguanghui luxiaobing12 vicizizi ncepuztf layota ruby1990 jpx720 Curry aliala tianyuthu uneyecat yunmu findsky wanliuf

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (103 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2020-9-20 08:24

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部